Team changes V Cats

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cruiser
    What the frack!
    • Jul 2004
    • 6114

    #31
    Originally posted by JF_Bay22_SCG
    I agree. Put Schneider where he can be most damaging, on a half forward flank doing the crumbing and peppering the goals. He is a bit of a hog, loves to kick a goal himself, but as we saw in the final against St Kilda when on song does have the potential to change a match.

    With him it is just a matter of being given space to run and a bit of confidence.

    JF
    I totally agree. Playing him in defence is inexplicable.
    Occupational hazards:
    I don't eat animals since discovering this ability. I used to. But one day the lamb I was eating came through to me and ever since then I haven't been able to eat meat.
    - animal psychic Amanda de Warren

    Comment

    • elroy67
      Parking Cars
      • Mar 2005
      • 419

      #32
      Originally posted by cruiser
      I totally agree. Playing him in defence is inexplicable.
      I actually think its a good idea.

      Many on these forums have been annoyed at our lack of run out of defence. Why not have a skillful, fast player who can carry the ball through the midfield and deliver to a target.

      I thought Schneider played his best game for the swans last weekend, playing out of defence. We currently have only Kennelly that provides that sort of dash.

      There are far too many trying to take up space in our forward line as it is.
      We demand rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty.

      Comment

      • NMWBloods
        Taking Refuge!!
        • Jan 2003
        • 15819

        #33
        Originally posted by cruiser
        I totally agree. Playing him in defence is inexplicable.
        I thought it worked pretty well. Kept Davey relatively quiet and gave us some good run from the back line. One of our better players on Sunday.
        Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

        "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

        Comment

        • floppinab
          Senior Player
          • Jan 2003
          • 1681

          #34
          Originally posted by cruiser
          I totally agree. Playing him in defence is inexplicable.
          It has improved his endurance and understanding of the game, in addition to providing the run out of defence with Kennelly out of the side.

          With kennelly back he should be playing at least half the game up front I'd have thought alternating across half back and half forward.

          Comment

          • Jeffers1984
            Veterans List
            • Jan 2003
            • 4564

            #35
            I didn't mind him down back esp half back. He provided great drive and run in the 3rd quarter when we finally decided to go through the corridor quicker.

            Definately one of his best games last Sunday.
            Official Driver Of The "Who Gives A @@@@ As The Player Will Get Delisted Anyway" Bandwagon.

            Comment

            • floppinab
              Senior Player
              • Jan 2003
              • 1681

              #36
              Originally posted by NMWBloods
              Yeah, that's all that was needed because the team is travelling so well...
              In comparison to the Cats who are what..... 2 and 2 and some poor performances from Steve Johnson and Lonergan see them back in the two's.

              Surely we'll see changes if we go down this weekend,.......... won't we?????

              Comment

              • Ruckman
                Ego alta, ergo ictus
                • Nov 2003
                • 3990

                #37
                Originally posted by BarneyG
                I think he (Superted) would do alot better if they cemented him into a key position, my preference would be FF and Baz at CHF.
                I was wondering if anyone else noticed him drop his head after he missed that goal in the first quarter last week? He'd started well but seemd to drift out of the game after that.
                It's just a little thing but maybe he's not 100% confidence wise?

                This week is going to be a big game for LRT, last year Charlie Gardiner absolutely killed him, I thught it was his worst performance, it will be interesting to see what happens this year.

                Comment

                • SimonH
                  Salt future's rising
                  • Aug 2004
                  • 1647

                  #38
                  Originally posted by floppinab
                  In comparison to the Cats who are what..... 2 and 2 and some poor performances from Steve Johnson and Lonergan see them back in the two's.

                  Surely we'll see changes if we go down this weekend,.......... won't we?????
                  We should certainly see some freakin' changes if we give up 15 goals again. And those changes should involve the following:
                  IN: Dempster.

                  What on earth this kid did to get dropped is beyond me. I'm open to being corrected, but unlike most players in their first 25-ish games, I reckon he's yet to play a single shocker in a Swans guernsey. Unflappable under pressure, plays for the defensive unit rather than just covering his man, kept a cool head throughout the extraordinary tightness of the 2005 finals series... etcetera.

                  Comment

                  Working...