Changes for Round 6?

[JudesaGun]

Should there be any?

I think the team gelled well last week, and don't envisage that any changes will/ should be made. Maybe Dempster in for McVeigh or Fosdike?

Once Davis is fit, i think this is our best line up to take us to back-to-back:

Backs
Richards Barry Bolton
Schnieder LRT Kennelly

Centres
Malceski Ablett Crouch

Forwards
Buchanan Hall O?Keefe
Richards O?Loughlin Davis

Foll
Bolton Kirk Jolly

Interchange
Chambers Matthews Williams Dempster

Emergencies
Fosdike McVeigh Vogels

[garethb83]

Re: Changes for Round 6?

Originally posted by JudesaGun
Should there be any?

I think the team gelled well last week, and don't envisage that any changes will/ should be made. Maybe Dempster in for McVeigh or Fosdike?

Once Davis is fit, i think this is our best line up to take us to back-to-back:

Backs
Richards Barry Bolton
Schnieder LRT Kennelly

Centres
Malceski Ablett Crouch

Forwards
Buchanan Hall O?Keefe
Richards O?Loughlin Davis

Foll
Bolton Kirk Jolly

Interchange
Chambers Matthews Williams Dempster

Emergencies
Fosdike McVeigh Vogels

I had no idea SuperTed was good enough to play in the forwards and the backs at the same time?

To be honest, after the weekend, i think both McVeigh and Fosdike deserve to be in the lineup, not just emergencies.

[Pommie Swannie]

I would definitely keep Mcveigh in the squad, not in the emergencies.

I'm looking forward to seeing the eski develop with a run in the side and increased confidence.

[hammo]

Very harsh on Fosdike, although he hasn't been spectacular this season (he's not alone there though).

Surely he's a better option that Mathews for example.

The jury must be out on Dempster. Sure he has potential but I'm sure the coaching staff have their reasons for putting him back in the 2s. (Dangerous statement given many on RWO's love affair with Dempster).

[Claret]

Yeah that Goodes bloke has nothing

[Doctor]

Fosdike & McVeigh should be there for sure. You'd bring one of them in to allow Richards to stick to either the forward line or back line I guess :-)

The other one would be in for Vogels, a player of promise to be sure but I can't see how you'd justify his inclusion at the expense of one of the two mentioned above.

Just my opinion anyway.

[Claret]

And while we're at it we should drop that Hall character

[Carolyn]

Re: Changes for Round 6?

Originally posted by JudesaGun
Should there be any?

I think the team gelled well last week, and don't envisage that any changes will/ should be made. Maybe Dempster in for McVeigh or Fosdike?

Once Davis is fit, i think this is our best line up to take us to back-to-back:

Backs
Richards Barry Bolton
Schnieder LRT Kennelly

Centres
Malceski Ablett Crouch

Forwards
Buchanan Hall O' Keefe
Richards O' Loughlin Davis

Foll
Bolton Kirk Jolly

Interchange
Chambers Matthews Williams Dempster

Emergencies
Fosdike McVeigh Vogels

Why put Fosdike in emergency?
Why have you got Richards twice?

Put Fosdike where one of the Richards is. There, problem solved.

[liz]

Re: Re: Changes for Round 6?

Originally posted by Carolyn
Why put Fosdike in emergency?
Why have you got Richards twice?

Put Fosdike where one of the Richards is. There, problem solved.

But who else has he dropped? Davis and Dempster have come in, McVeigh assumed out. Someone else must have made way.

[Claret]

Re: Re: Re: Changes for Round 6?

Originally posted by liz
But who else has he dropped? Davis and Dempster have come in, McVeigh assumed out. Someone else must have made way.

Originally posted by Claret
Yeah that Goodes bloke has nothing

Read people

[RogueSwan]

Re: Changes for Round 6?

Originally posted by JudesaGun
Maybe Dempster in for McVeigh or Fosdike?

If any one was going to make way for Dempster it should be NOG. Both have been used by Roos as defensive stoppers/flankers.

[The Big Cat]

Vogels for SuperTed

[caj23]

Originally posted by The Big Cat
Vogels for SuperTed

I'm with you on that one BC

[Captain]

I want Vogels to have a run.

Difficult to drop someone, but would have to say Fosdike. No real reason but for team balance.

[Jeffers1984]

I would expect no change.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/afl/roos-still-wary-of-bite-in-ageing-lions/2006/05/03/1146335809350.html

"Roos doesn't expect to make any changes when the team is announced tonight, adding that Nick Davis was likely to make his return from his hamstring strain the following week."