Nick Davis is a champ

[goswannie14]

talk about hijacking meaningful threads

Correct grammar is meaningful.

[AnnieH]

Sorry Mr Juicy.
Nick Davis is a chump. Oops. Champ

[Mr_Juicy]

talk about hijacking meaningful threads

[Layby]

It is 'should have' and if there is a proper contraction it must be should've.

Sanecow is pregnant ?

Congratulations

[goswannie14]

For those that don't realise this is a joke:

'Should of' is totally incorrect. It is 'should have' and if there is a proper contraction it must be should've.

Now you've spoiled the fun.

I'll bet though that the majority of people who post "could of, should of or would of" instead of the correct "could have, should have, would have" will still post the incorrect English.

[swantastic]

He sure is,but

..he's not as good as Melcho

[stellation]

He sure is!

[573v30]

Nick Davis is a champ.

[Ludwig]

For those that don't realise this is a joke:

'Should of' is totally incorrect. It is 'should have' and if there is a proper contraction it must be should've.

[goswannie14]

You're not serious

Deadly serious.

[DeadlyAkkuret]

I've been wrong before, but I think the correct grammar is should'of.

You're not serious

[ROK Lobster]

What's the missing letter (denoted by the aphostophe before of)?
Doesn't an aphostrophe mean a letter has been omitted?

Sometimes it means "fthe" has been omitted.

[dread and might]

Oh God. Lock it now

[AnnieH]

I've been wrong before, but I think the correct grammar is should'of.

It's been an awful long time since I studied English ...

What's the missing letter (denoted by the aphostophe before of)?
Doesn't an aphostrophe mean a letter has been omitted?

[Industrial Fan]

Should of gotten used too it by now.

I've been wrong before, but I think the correct grammar is should'of.