Clayton's Trade Week over for Swans

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bas
    Veterans List
    • Jan 2003
    • 4457

    Clayton's Trade Week over for Swans

    According to reports this morning, apart from officially confirming the paperwork for deals with aints and geelong, that's it for trading.

    I?m really disappointed with that. All this hype at the start of the week about being active and all we have is two new for two gone. I had hoped the Club would have traded both Bucky and B1 because the additions, I believe it doesn?t change the team that much.

    With a poor draft, I?m predicting that the Swans will draft 2 new (11,26), no third round pick leaving 4th round only plus Bird (assuming last pick). I am assuming 4th round will go on one of our delisted players.

    Barlow and Jack to be promoted. Mattner there now. That makes 7 on list.

    Seven will go. Swans to use full rookie.
    Very ho hum week. Roos saying it's the start of rebuilding, what with 2 new players. Funny man
    In memory of my little Staffy - Dicey, 17.06.2005 to 1.12.2011- I'll miss you mate.
  • Triple B
    Formerly 'BBB'
    • Feb 2003
    • 6999

    #2
    Originally posted by Bas
    I?m really disappointed with that. All this hype at the start of the week about being active and all we have is two new for two gone.
    That's way more active than the clubs been for 6 or 7 years. You're hard to please.
    Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

    Comment

    • goswannie14
      Leadership Group
      • Sep 2005
      • 11166

      #3
      We've actually done more trading than most other clubs. Have a look at the confirmed trades up until now....

      Trade week official list
      Does God believe in Atheists?

      Comment

      • caj23
        Senior Player
        • Aug 2003
        • 2462

        #4
        Its not the quantity of trades that we've done, its the quality that is the issue

        Comment

        • Plugger46
          Senior Player
          • Apr 2003
          • 3674

          #5
          I'm pretty happy with our week.

          We've offloaded Dempster, who can't play. Schneider is a loss, but replaceable.

          We needed some class so we got Mattner. And we needed another tall, so we got Playfair.
          Bloods

          "Lockett is the best of all time" - Robert Harvey, Darrel Baldock, Nathan Burke, Kevin Bartlett, Bob Skilton

          Comment

          • Triple B
            Formerly 'BBB'
            • Feb 2003
            • 6999

            #6
            Furthermore, being active in trade week is not necessarily measured by how many trades are made.

            So many clubs go to trade week and put Neville Nobody and Harry Hopeless on the table for clubs to look at. Rightly so, other clubs laugh and move on.

            If the reports are correct, as well as Schneider and Dempster, Buchanon and J.Bolton have also been put on the table. All regular senior players in an extemely successful period and premiership players all.

            Roos' declaration of being active meant that they were willing to put quality players who could be covered at a pinch to gain the type of players we need, not just offer the likes of Vogels, Crouch etc. who are not trade bait at all.
            Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

            Comment

            • Mr_Juicy
              Warming the Bench
              • Mar 2007
              • 397

              #7
              Originally posted by Will Sangster
              Its not the quantity of trades that we've done, its the quality that is the issue
              Darren Jolly come back to bite you on the bum again?

              Comment

              • caj23
                Senior Player
                • Aug 2003
                • 2462

                #8
                Originally posted by Mr_Juicy
                Darren Jolly come back to bite you on the bum again?
                Huh??

                Comment

                • ernie koala
                  Senior Player
                  • May 2007
                  • 3251

                  #9
                  Roos is nothing if not consistant..How many times have we heard him talk of changes and shake ups during the season. Only to see one forced change made. He has brought the same form to trade week.
                  Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MT

                  Comment

                  • Donners
                    On the Rookie List
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 1061

                    #10
                    Well, the two things I wanted out of this trade period were an outside midfielder and a key defender. Those two needs have been met at minimal cost.

                    The disappointment for me is the deal we got for losing two young players from an aging side, and that can only be explained by salary cap pressure.

                    It remains to be seen what will be done with Bolton. This may have been a tactic to let him know he may not be in as much demand as he thinks, lessening his contract demands. If he refuses to re-sign at a reasonable price, he may well go for nothing.

                    Comment

                    • hammo
                      Veterans List
                      • Jul 2003
                      • 5554

                      #11
                      There is no reason why Jude Bolton will not figure in a last minute trade today. Stranger things have happened...
                      "As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk

                      Comment

                      • goswannie14
                        Leadership Group
                        • Sep 2005
                        • 11166

                        #12
                        Originally posted by hammo
                        There is no reason why Jude Bolton will not figure in a last minute trade today. Stranger things have happened...
                        Thanks Hammo, you've just brightened my day with that suggestion.
                        Does God believe in Atheists?

                        Comment

                        • Triple B
                          Formerly 'BBB'
                          • Feb 2003
                          • 6999

                          #13
                          Jude + pick 26 to Melbourne for pick 14?

                          Everybody outside this board would say that it is a crazy deal, Jude could almost get pick 14 itself.

                          Fact is, Jude is surplus to our needs and fringe players from other clubs are surplus.

                          The advantages would be we have one less player to delist.

                          With our list as it stands, Picks 11 and 14 + pick 100 or whatever for Bird, I could live with that.
                          Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

                          Comment

                          • hammo
                            Veterans List
                            • Jul 2003
                            • 5554

                            #14
                            Originally posted by BBB
                            Jude + pick 26 to Melbourne for pick 14?
                            I could live with that.

                            Maybe Jude and pick 26 to to the Dogs for #5?
                            "As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk

                            Comment

                            • Triple B
                              Formerly 'BBB'
                              • Feb 2003
                              • 6999

                              #15
                              Originally posted by hammo
                              I could live with that.

                              Maybe Jude and pick 26 to to the Dogs for #5?
                              Even better

                              Any first rounder would be acceptable, obviously the higher the better.
                              Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

                              Comment

                              Working...