Essendon delistings

[Layby]

We need a CHF - why wouldn't we draft him?

There is this bloke called Hall on the list, who, when fit, goes alright at CHF.

[NMWBloods]

There is this bloke called Hall on the list, who, when fit, goes alright at CHF.

Then we need a tall FF - Bradley could work well doing that.

[swantastic]

Playfair is a defender ruined by playing him as a forward.

Bradley is a forward ruined by playing him as a defender.

We could take both (and use them in the right spots).

IMO a defender cant be ruined by playing forward but a forward can be ruined by playing back.

What i mean is a defender playing forward it can only improve his kicking and marking skills,and he already has that defender mentality to chase and tackle which is very handy in the F50.

When a forward plays back they tend to try and mark the ball more and not punch,but they generally have good kicking skills which is good in defence.Also some tend to be lazy and dont chase down their opponents which is bad defensively.

Your right tho we could have a crack at both,but Sheedy said Bradley was a star and know he is getting delisted which makes me wonder.Knights said he was going for a youth policy but the last time i checked Keppler was only 21 or so,and to me he still fits the mould.

[Layby]

Then we need a tall FF - Bradley could work well doing that.

As long as MOL stays on list he will play out of the square, when rested it should be Davis (back in your pants Stella !) .

His knees wont take him up the ground

[NMWBloods]

As long as MOL stays on list he will play out of the square, when rested it should be Davis (back in your pants Stella !) .

His knees wont take him up the ground

MOL should play in the forward pocket. I think we're missing a tall marking forward.

[Layby]

MOL should play in the forward pocket. I think we're missing a tall marking forward.

Agree, but cant see it with our list as it is.

MOL, Davis & Hall plus another tall forward wont happen. No foward pressure coming out, we would get rebounded too easily

[NMWBloods]

Agree, but cant see it with our list as it is.

MOL, Davis & Hall plus another tall forward wont happen. No foward pressure coming out, we would get rebounded too easily

Surprisingly good point from the man who takes nothing seriously!

[goswannie14]

Playfair is a defender ruined by playing him as a forward.

Bradley is a forward ruined by playing him as a defender.

We could take both (and use them in the right spots).

You'll never make an AFL coach with outrageous suggestions like that Bloods.

[NMWBloods]

You'll never make an AFL coach with outrageous suggestions like that Bloods.

Yes, I should turn Playfair into a tagger and Sampi into a key defender and Mattner into a full forward. Or perhaps just make them all taggers. This coaching thing is easy!

[swantastic]

Yes, I should turn Playfair into a tagger and Sampi into a key defender and Mattner into a full forward. Or perhaps just make them all taggers. This coaching thing is easy!

Is that you Roosy?