If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I agree with all of this. I think most of us, whether Davis fans or not, want to see this.
However, I do disagree with your opening paragraph.
I still think that ROK's contention that the Geelong game carries some weight with expectations is essentially correct.
Scoring performances in games illustrates my thinking a little more.
Let's say we rate games out of 10, say 4 is the minimum to get a game.
9 = Davis' Geelong game
8 = Fan expectations of how well Davis can play based on that game
7 = Club expectations (based on a number of things)
6 = How well Davis should be able to play (per the top para)
5 = How well Davis has played overall in 2006-2007
4 = How well Davis has played in 2008
He is playing below expectations that even if he does play well enough to make the squad, the perception of his performance is much lower. That Geelong game has increased that benchmark in the eyes of both club and supporters, far more so for the latter. Therefore, instead of being 1 notch below his best in the past and 2 notches now, it appears to be 2 & 3 for the club and 3 & 4 for some fans. This making it appear far worse and justifying his exclusion from the team.
Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun. Blessedare the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.
How long before the Daily Telegraph does a story on the "new" RWO??
"As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk
Comment