Reasons why I want .....

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ScottH
    It's Goodes to cheer!!
    • Sep 2003
    • 23665

    #31
    I wish Stokes had of got a game ahead of Varcoe. He was pretty useless for most of the game.

    Comment

    • mcs
      Travelling Swannie!!
      • Jul 2007
      • 8177

      #32
      Originally posted by Margie
      In such tight Grand Finals, you can't help feeling sorry for the team that loses. This one could have gone either way but Geelong found a way to win, while the Saints bungled several chances.

      Chapman, Taylor and Ablett stood up brilliantly in that last quarter. It always takes a little bit of luck and maybe the weather, bounce of the ball, etc. worked to Geelong's advantage.

      I thought the Saints got the better of the umpiring decisions in the first half. The free paid against Millburn for being "demonstrative" was completely over the top.
      While I agree about feeling sorry for the team that loses, footy is a simple game. if you can't kick straight and waste your chances, you nearly always won't win. Happened to Geelong last year, and to an extent St Kilda yesterday. Luck doesn't play a part for St Kilda yesterday if they took their chances. Especially Milne and Schneider who both wasted very kickable chances when the Saints were on top.
      "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

      Comment

      • laughingnome
        Amateur Statsman
        • Jul 2006
        • 1624

        #33
        Exactly. At the end of the day they didn't kick straight, and didn't have the fortune of Tom Hawkins to have an umpire not see a blatent poster. How awful would it have been if that kick had decided the match?
        10100111001 ;-)

        Comment

        • mcs
          Travelling Swannie!!
          • Jul 2007
          • 8177

          #34
          Originally posted by laughingnome
          Exactly. At the end of the day they didn't kick straight, and didn't have the fortune of Tom Hawkins to have an umpire not see a blatent poster. How awful would it have been if that kick had decided the match?
          I was thinking that in the game. I saw it straight out when Hawkins kicked it and can't believe the umpire missed it.
          "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

          Comment

          • laughingnome
            Amateur Statsman
            • Jul 2006
            • 1624

            #35
            Originally posted by mcs
            I was thinking that in the game. I saw it straight out when Hawkins kicked it and can't believe the umpire missed it.
            Ditto. I assumed that it was a trick of the camera and I was wrong until the replay showed all. The saints fans in the background were right p@@@ed off.
            10100111001 ;-)

            Comment

            • Xie Shan
              Senior Player
              • Jan 2003
              • 2929

              #36
              Originally posted by Claret
              I was supporting the Saints for one reason . . . . Matthew Scarlett.
              What? I thought all the Cats players who spoke after the game went out of their way to acknowledge the Saints and were largely gracious winners, I know West Coast were (rightly) criticised for their carrying on in 2006 but Geelong were fine!

              Comment

              • Pace To Burn
                On the Rookie List
                • Jul 2007
                • 748

                #37
                Originally posted by ScottH
                I wish Stokes had of got a game ahead of Varcoe. He was pretty useless for most of the game.
                Very generous there Scott, he was woefull. As has been said the saints didnt take there chances and paid the price. FWIW i reckon Gram was easily BOG, was always in the right place to mop up and used the ball well, although it very rarely gets given to the losing side. I reckon Taylor or even Max Rooke had outstanding games and could easily have won the NS also
                The edge is not the limit, It's just the starting point...

                Comment

                • Claret
                  Support Staff
                  • Sep 2005
                  • 1104

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Xie Shan
                  What? I thought all the Cats players who spoke after the game went out of their way to acknowledge the Saints and were largely gracious winners, I know West Coast were (rightly) criticised for their carrying on in 2006 but Geelong were fine!
                  All except one - Scarlett. The rest of them seem to be ripping blokes and I love the way they play the game. He just brings them down a rung or two. He sounded a lot like Dean Cox post 2006, although in Cox's defence he was heavily under the influence at the time of his comments.
                  And the man who started it all, the Schneiderman . . . . .

                  Comment

                  • hot potato
                    Sir Ashmole Gruntbucket
                    • Jun 2007
                    • 1122

                    #39
                    it's very Un Aussie to bang on how great WE are (Scarlett), the Cats were as Bomber confessed very lucky indeed to win. They were paid a goal for a point, how did the goal ump not see that from his close proximity.
                    This game was going to go either way by some touch of luck and as it turned out The Cats got home from a relfex toe poke that happened to land in the hands of Ablett who kicked a beautiful long drop punt to the goal square.
                    Despite all the clangers from GF pressure , what a classic. A beauty for the code with so many watching from all codes and credes.

                    HP
                    "He was proud of us when we won and he was still proud of us when we lost' Tami Roos about Paul Sept 06.

                    Comment

                    Working...