Swannies vs Geelong Preview

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • swanspant12
    On the Rookie List
    • Oct 2009
    • 593

    Swannies vs Geelong Preview

    Massive, massive game. We have played really well at the scg this year and hopefully if we play the first 3 quarters against the dons against the cats we should win. It will be a tight battle and they match up well against us. Hopefully goodesy comes back he will be a massive inclusion and if we win the midfield battle and get it to Kizza and Jetts to break the lines we can hopefully get a win. Teddy and Grundy will take care of hawkins and podisadly just like they did against Hurley and Crameri and run off our backline with shawy and smithy will be crucial.

    Shaw Richards Johnson


    Smith Grundy Mattner


    Jetta Kennedy Jack


    O'keefe Reid Mcveigh


    Mcglynn Goodes Roberts-Thompson


    Ruck: Mumford, Hannebery, Bolton


    I/C: Malceski, TDL, Armstrong
    LRT. Lord Roberts-Thompson. He may look like the Munster, but looks can be deceiving.


    2012 Bloods Premiers.
  • mcs
    Travelling Swannie!!
    • Jul 2007
    • 8190

    #2
    I hope the boys try something radical like playing well for all 4 quarters rather than 3 + a sleeping quarter!

    Should be a cracker and I'm disappointed that I won't be able to get up the highway to watch it being a Friday game and all.
    "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

    Comment

    • wolftone57
      Veterans List
      • Aug 2008
      • 5863

      #3
      Originally posted by swanspant12
      Massive, massive game. We have played really well at the scg this year and hopefully if we play the first 3 quarters against the dons against the cats we should win. It will be a tight battle and they match up well against us. Hopefully goodesy comes back he will be a massive inclusion and if we win the midfield battle and get it to Kizza and Jetts to break the lines we can hopefully get a win. Teddy and Grundy will take care of hawkins and podisadly just like they did against Hurley and Crameri and run off our backline with shawy and smithy will be crucial.

      Shaw Richards Johnson


      Smith Grundy Mattner


      Jetta Kennedy Jack


      O'keefe Reid Mcveigh


      Mcglynn Goodes Roberts-Thompson


      Ruck: Mumford, Hannebery, Bolton


      I/C: Malceski, TDL, Armstrong
      I think you really have to start Armstrong and give him a job, like kicking out as he seems to find a player when Marty & Rhyce can't. I think it is about him being a more precision kick than those guys. They are good on the long kick but the short precision kick has never really been their forte. Mal as Sub! Who is the fourth on the I/C? You only name three! No sub? Bird maybe? Why would we get rid of Mike Pyke as he is doing a great job? I'd rather Mal go out that Pykie! The big guys have brought a real change to the forward line!

      Comment

      • R-1
        Senior Player
        • Aug 2005
        • 1042

        #4
        Hope it isn't wet.

        Comment

        • Go Swannies
          Veterans List
          • Sep 2003
          • 5697

          #5
          Originally posted by R-1
          Hope it isn't wet.
          You didn't get money on Jude for the Brownlow?

          Comment

          • rojo
            Opti-pessi-misti
            • Mar 2009
            • 1103

            #6
            Yes, if Goodes and McGlynn come back in and everyone else is fit, crunch time is upon us. I am sure they will include Bird, he holds the mantle of tackle king at the moment. So who to leave out? Pyke and Mal do seem to be the vulnerable ones, I can't see them dropping/subbing any of the others. Out of LRT and Pyke, Mal and Armstrong.

            Comment

            • dimelb
              pr. dim-melb; m not f
              • Jun 2003
              • 6889

              #7
              I'd drop Mal before Pyke, whose input is much more significant.
              He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

              Comment

              • msb
                On the Rookie List
                • Mar 2006
                • 827

                #8
                Im quite confident in beating the cats, we showed the other night (the first 3 qtrs anyway) of the type of footy we can play and if this is produced again, along with the game being played at the SCG and with goodsey back, we really should win. Everitt will obviously make way for goodes but good luck to the selectors in picking someone to make way for mcglynn, malceski perhaps??

                Comment

                • top40
                  Regular in the Side
                  • May 2007
                  • 933

                  #9
                  Interesting the mention about it raining. There have only been three Friday nights held at the SCG in the past 15 years during the Home and Away Season. Twice there have been greatly anticipated ( verses Essendon 2001, and Carlton 2011) games. In both games it poured, and sadly the Swans were beaten

                  The only night it didn't rain was ANZAC Day 2003, where the Swans came back from 20 points down at three quarter time to beat Melbourne.

                  Please do not rain!

                  Comment

                  • GongSwan
                    Senior Player
                    • Jan 2009
                    • 1362

                    #10
                    Originally posted by dimelb
                    I'd drop Mal before Pyke, whose input is much more significant.
                    I watched the Freo game last night, a lot was made of Reid geting a bump and being injured, but the thing I noticed was Mal had his head caved in and we haven't seemed to give him the same sort of opportunity to get over it, or even mentioned a hit like that as a reason for loss of form
                    You can't argue with a sick mind - Joe Walsh

                    Comment

                    • rojo
                      Opti-pessi-misti
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 1103

                      #11
                      Thanks msb I forgot about Everitt. I'll change my possibilities to Everitt or Pyke for Goodes. You would hope Pyke would stay, to change with Mummy in the ruck.

                      Comment

                      • Clammers
                        On the Rookie List
                        • Aug 2010
                        • 6

                        #12
                        Agree re Pyke. Having one ruck only is a recipe for injury and Mumford looks proppy even when he is supposed to be fit. So does LRT for that matter.

                        Comment

                        • GongSwan
                          Senior Player
                          • Jan 2009
                          • 1362

                          #13
                          I think if Goodes is coming back into the team one has to be prepared to drop a forward to accommodate him as yd have to think he will play as a forward while getting back to fitness. That said, as much as I'd like to see TDL continue, he has to be added to the list of possible outs
                          You can't argue with a sick mind - Joe Walsh

                          Comment

                          • Mountain Man
                            Regular in the Side
                            • Feb 2008
                            • 910

                            #14
                            I would be surprised if Armstrong and Malceski were both selected - especially against Geelong. It seems to me they are too similar (in both their strengths and weaknesses).

                            Comment

                            • R-1
                              Senior Player
                              • Aug 2005
                              • 1042

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Go Swannies
                              You didn't get money on Jude for the Brownlow?
                              Geelong are very very good in the wet.

                              Comment

                              Working...