Changes for Rnd 5 V West Coast

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aardvark
    Veterans List
    • Mar 2010
    • 5685

    Changes for Rnd 5 V West Coast

    Outs. Nankervis
    Ins. Sinclair?

    I hope Papley gets another chance although I don't think there is room for him and Benny in the same team.
    I'd drop Richards if we had anyone to replace him with.
  • Melbourne_Blood
    Senior Player
    • May 2010
    • 3312

    #2
    Originally posted by aardvark
    Outs. Nankervis
    Ins. Sinclair?

    I hope Papley gets another chance although I don't think there is room for him and Benny in the same team.
    I'd drop Richards if we had anyone to replace him with.
    Benny was very good I thought. Would you drop him and keep Papley?

    Comment

    • MattW
      Veterans List
      • May 2011
      • 4195

      #3
      Originally posted by aardvark
      Outs. Nankervis
      Ins. Sinclair?

      I hope Papley gets another chance although I don't think there is room for him and Benny in the same team.
      I'd drop Richards if we had anyone to replace him with.
      Yep, Teddy was a step behind tonight.

      It was a new experience for Papley. He'll learn from it. Who comes in for him? Not Jack. Rose quieter today. Reckon Rohan more a threat to McGlynn.

      Nankervis was good tonight. Has the courage and smarts.

      Comment

      • aardvark
        Veterans List
        • Mar 2010
        • 5685

        #4
        Originally posted by Melbourne_Blood
        Benny was very good I thought. Would you drop him and keep Papley?
        Probably not. It will be interesting to see what happens there.

        Comment

        • longmile
          Crumber
          • Apr 2011
          • 3360

          #5
          Can't see Richard getting better/returning to old form

          Comment

          • jetts32
            On the Rookie List
            • Oct 2012
            • 200

            #6
            Keep Papley and Mcglynn in the same team. Both have great defensive pressure in the forward line but Benny also pinch hits in the midfield. So to keep Papley in the forward line is a good idea I think.

            OUT: Nankervis, Robinson
            In: Sinclair, Jones

            I did like Nankervis tonight, great follow up work and tackles, couple of good grabs but Sinclair being out tonight could've really made the difference.

            Comment

            • Scottee
              Senior Player
              • Aug 2003
              • 1585

              #7
              Originally posted by Melbourne_Blood
              Benny was very good I thought. Would you drop him and keep Papley?
              9 possessions.

              Sent from my SM-T805Y using Tapatalk
              We have them where we want them, everything is going according to plan!

              Comment

              • Luke Shannon
                Suspended by the MRP
                • Apr 2016
                • 119

                #8
                Ins

                Sinclair if ready
                Jones
                Hewitt

                Out

                Nankervis
                Towers
                Papley

                Notes

                Papley will be starting to fatigue. Give him modified game time in the reserves.

                Love to see Mills spend time forward with Heeney. Great mark and kick.

                McVeigh could spend time forward to accommodate Jones.

                Comment

                • 707
                  Veterans List
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 6204

                  #9
                  Can't believe it that no one has mentioned Towers as an out, was a weak link tonight

                  Comment

                  • tasswan
                    Warming the Bench
                    • Aug 2006
                    • 334

                    #10
                    Wow, we lost a game that could have gone either way and people want to make 3 changes?

                    I agree Ted, Papley and Towers had an off night, but all 3 have played good games this year.

                    My only change would be Sinclair for Nankervis, although I thought Toby played well

                    Comment

                    • ernie koala
                      Senior Player
                      • May 2007
                      • 3251

                      #11
                      OUT : Towers ... He plays like a startled hare.
                      Nankervis...played really well last night and will get more opportunities no doubt

                      IN : Rose ... Much more of a threat, always busy.
                      Sinclair... Hopefully he's fit to take on his old side. He brings mobility and he's a forward 50 threat.
                      Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MT

                      Comment

                      • aguy
                        Senior Player
                        • Mar 2014
                        • 1324

                        #12
                        I agree that nankervis played his part but I thought that sinclairs absence was the difference between us winning and losing that game. Papley has been crumbing brilliantly off Sinclair and that was largely responsible for papleys quiet night. Towers was average I agree. I think he makes way for Reid when he returns but not yet. Towers has also played better when Sinclair was in the team.

                        My changes:
                        IN: Sinclair
                        OUT: Nankervis

                        If Kieren jack needs a rest after his head knocks then I would play hewett for him. I would really like to get hewett back into the team as his disposal efficiency and silky skills across half back and midfield were a noticeable benefit in the first two games

                        Comment

                        • barry
                          Veterans List
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 8499

                          #13
                          We had few outside players. The crowd did. After a series of handballs they always found a free player. We didnt.

                          I think it puts us back in that 4th to 8th ranking. Adelaide arent that good

                          Comment

                          • Ludwig
                            Veterans List
                            • Apr 2007
                            • 9359

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Luke Shannon
                            Ins

                            Sinclair if ready
                            Jones
                            Hewitt

                            Out

                            Nankervis
                            Towers
                            Papley

                            Notes

                            Papley will be starting to fatigue. Give him modified game time in the reserves.

                            Love to see Mills spend time forward with Heeney. Great mark and kick.

                            McVeigh could spend time forward to accommodate Jones.
                            These were my initial post-game thoughts as well, although I would keep Macca in defence and play Jones through the midfield and forward. He's a good pressure player.

                            We've been playing too many forwards and are getting caught out on turnovers.

                            We need to choose between Papley and McGlynn. I'd play Hewett more in the midfield and Robinson forward.

                            Comment

                            • Maltopia
                              Senior Player
                              • Apr 2016
                              • 1556

                              #15
                              Originally posted by barry
                              We had few outside players. The crowd did. After a series of handballs they always found a free player. We didnt.

                              I think it puts us back in that 4th to 8th ranking. Adelaide arent that good
                              It is early in the season still. Who do you have as top 3? Hawthorn, WC and who else? We could have easily won this game if not for a few bad calls and the unavailability of Sinclair and Macca needing more game time.

                              Hopefully, by the end of the bye rounds, we will have Tahlia back (to develop into a replacement for Ted), Reid (another tall option) and Rohan so I still think we are genuine top four. We will know by Round 10 as we have played WC, Hawthorn and NM by then.

                              Comment

                              Working...