If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Not sure about the report, but in one of the skirmishes he appeared to throw a punch
Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk
All the replays of the incidents that I have seen he will be fine. He didn't bump him in the head and the "punches" seemed to be open handed. Am watching a replay of the game at the moment so I can check properly.
Hopefully he is cleared because he loves playing against the bombers!
Would like to see Gary Rohan up front, zooming around. What a pest he would be. His closing speed would make it difficult for the opposition to get ball out and he wouldn't have to worry about defence, which is not his strong point. Plus he can kick goals. No point running from the backline if you turn it over at the end because your team mates can't catch up... We saw against Richmond at the end what he can do close to goal. And he can take marks.
Melican for Marsh
Dawson for Towers although I'm happy for Towers to stay.
I'd like to see these changes. We need the extra tall against Essendon. People might say it's unlucky for Towers to get dropped but Dawson needs to come in for someone and if not Towers then who? The only other I'm thinking is Rohan but historically he'll stay in.
Buddy's report is nothing, didn't even get him high. No fine no weeks off
For me it's Dawson for Towers. Doesn't get enough of it n for someone that has a lot of pace he didn't use it especially at the mcg. Dawson adds a bit in that he can also add a bit to the forward structure. Which if need be releases Reid to play down back if their forwards get on a role n that's why I'm up in the air about Melican for Marsh, Marsh played well yesterday with composure at times. I'd like to drop Sinclair but I don't think Longmire will. Adds absolutely nothing as a ruck/forward.
Comment