Is Longmire cooked?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aardvark
    Veterans List
    • Mar 2010
    • 5685

    #16
    So with Jones and probably Grundy out next week what I don't want to see is the same boring hang in there type of game plan. Let the kids have a crack, I don't give a stuff how much we lose by so long as we have a go. The way we played tonight anyone would think we were coached by Ross Lyon.

    Comment

    • mattybloods
      Warming the Bench
      • Jul 2016
      • 482

      #17
      Players missing from our best 22; Reid, Naismith, Melican, Hannebery, Jack, McVeigh, Rohan and Mills (and a retired Tippett who would have played if fit). All would be in the starting 22 if fit, that's 8 players we need to cover in all parts of the ground. Our depth is being tested more than any recent year in memory. Not Longmire's fault. Premierships are built on list quality and low injuries.

      I really hope we look at recruiting one or 2 mature midfielders to get our contested and clearance game back to where it should be. Also need to work on our tackling

      Comment

      • Blood Fever
        Veterans List
        • Apr 2007
        • 4040

        #18
        Originally posted by mattybloods
        Players missing from our best 22; Reid, Naismith, Melican, Hannebery, Jack, McVeigh, Rohan and Mills (and a retired Tippett who would have played if fit). All would be in the starting 22 if fit, that's 8 players we need to cover in all parts of the ground. Our depth is being tested more than any recent year in memory. Not Longmire's fault. Premierships are built on list quality and low injuries.

        I really hope we look at recruiting one or 2 mature midfielders to get our contested and clearance game back to where it should be. Also need to work on our tackling

        Deserves to have his contract honoured or go on his own terms. Has contract til 2020 or 2021?

        Comment

        • Blood Fever
          Veterans List
          • Apr 2007
          • 4040

          #19
          Originally posted by aardvark
          So with Jones and probably Grundy out next week what I don't want to see is the same boring hang in there type of game plan. Let the kids have a crack, I don't give a stuff how much we lose by so long as we have a go. The way we played tonight anyone would think we were coached by Ross Lyon.
          If we entered Inside 50 more frequently via our midfield, game plan would largely take care of itself. Other teams are running riot onto loose balls and at times doubling our inside 50 count. Not sustainable. Midfield prowess that we had has been decimated.

          Comment

          • Blood Fever
            Veterans List
            • Apr 2007
            • 4040

            #20
            Originally posted by aardvark
            So with Jones and probably Grundy out next week what I don't want to see is the same boring hang in there type of game plan. Let the kids have a crack, I don't give a stuff how much we lose by so long as we have a go. The way we played tonight anyone would think we were coached by Ross Lyon.
            If we entered Inside 50 more frequently via our midfield, game plan would largely take care of itself. Other teams are running riot onto loose balls and at times doubling our inside 50 count. Not sustainable. Midfield prowess that we had has been decimated.

            Comment

            • troyjones2525
              Swans Fanatic!
              • Mar 2008
              • 2908

              #21
              Originally posted by Blood Fever
              Deserves to have his contract honoured or go on his own terms. Has contract til 2020 or 2021?
              I understand and agree with all concerns here regarding our gameplan and no plan B and all the other knocks on Horse. But I agree with the above statement more. We have never had a rebuild or missed the 8 in his time leading the club. He deserves an opportunity to show if he is capable of doing that and turning things around. It's a challenge he's never faced before so nobody on here has the right to say that he can't do it as he's never actually had to try as yet!

              That time is now though and these things can take a few years, not weeks! I'm interested to see if A. He's up to it or B. He even wants to give it a go and not retire with his great record a la Roos.

              Time will tell and he deserves first shot!

              Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk

              Comment

              • pwm
                Registered User
                • Feb 2018
                • 5

                #22
                Originally posted by Ralph Dawg
                He can only come up with a plan that the players are capable of implementing. The way they we executing our basic skills at present, plan a down to z wont help.
                I agree. The really disappointing aspect of the last 2 games is when the boys have had a crack and run straight through the middle,passes whether by hand or kick haven't gone within a bulls roar of their target. If our skills had been only passable we would certainly have beaten the suns and problably the Bombers too

                Comment

                • barry
                  Veterans List
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 8499

                  #23
                  I dont think Longmire is to blame for current state of losing. Sure, questions still remain about turning top 4 finished into flags, but thats another issue.

                  My feeling is that right now, we can barely put a fit 22 on the park. This is based on the evidence:
                  - We are still blooding debutants like Cameron and Dawson at this late stage in the season.
                  - Previous out-of-favour players are getting a game (Allir)
                  - The circus around Reg Grundy's selection. He's obviously not fit, but we discovered that we need him half fit or not.
                  - Playing players who can barely move. Earlier Hannerbury and Jack, now Buddy.

                  Very hard to see us being a contender, with all these injuries. Doesnt matter how good the coach is.

                  Silver lining is we might see AJ back in the team before years end.

                  Comment

                  • Blood Fever
                    Veterans List
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 4040

                    #24
                    Originally posted by barry
                    I dont think Longmire is to blame for current state of losing. Sure, questions still remain about turning top 4 finished into flags, but thats another issue.

                    My feeling is that right now, we can barely put a fit 22 on the park. This is based on the evidence:
                    - We are still blooding debutants like Cameron and Dawson at this late stage in the season.
                    - Previous out-of-favour players are getting a game (Allir)
                    - The circus around Reg Grundy's selection. He's obviously not fit, but we discovered that we need him half fit or not.
                    - Playing players who can barely move. Earlier Hannerbury and Jack, now Buddy.

                    Very hard to see us being a contender, with all these injuries. Doesnt matter how good the coach is.

                    Silver lining is we might see AJ back in the team before years end.
                    +1

                    Comment

                    • KSAS
                      Senior Player
                      • Mar 2018
                      • 1763

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Blood Fever
                      If we entered Inside 50 more frequently via our midfield, game plan would largely take care of itself. Other teams are running riot onto loose balls and at times doubling our inside 50 count. Not sustainable. Midfield prowess that we had has been decimated.
                      That for me is our biggest problem at the moment, getting smashed in centre clearances which puts even more pressure on a backline which no longer has the experience/skill of years gone by to absorb & counter attack.

                      We lack an explosive midfielder to dash out of a centre clearance, last being Adam Goodes at his peak & Paul Williams. When fit, wondering if Rohan can start playing small amount of time in centre bounces (30% & 70% forward, reverse of what Danger does for Geelong), to help the dynamic in this area & also help Rohan get more involved.

                      I have every faith Longmire will adjust our game plan & playing style, because I think he has been so reluctant to let go of a game plan which has been part of our DNA for soooo long & proven successful. I trust that he & his coaching team will realise that change is being forced upon them.

                      Comment

                      • lwjoyner
                        Regular in the Side
                        • Nov 2004
                        • 942

                        #26
                        I think he is, his look in the coaches box is one of not knowing what to do.

                        Comment

                        • Markwebbos
                          Veterans List
                          • Jul 2016
                          • 7186

                          #27
                          Stats from last night. Clearances 35-34. Contested possessions 156–141. Inside 50s 72-39. We are just about breaking even in clearances but annihilated in turning those into inside 50s.

                          It’s a double whammy. We are being beaten on the inside and smashed on the outside.

                          Horse said it. The foundation of our game is winning the contest. If he can’t put out a team that holds it own in contested footy we struggle, although in the past we’ve lost clearances but won due to our better ball use. Not this year.

                          Richmond are the worst clearance team in the AFL but favourites for the premiership because they’ve developed a game plan that is based on creating turnovers near goal. We win the ball back in defence.

                          Hawthorns gameplan is based on being better ball users than their opponents.

                          It feels like we’ve reached a fork in the road. We have drafted a bunch of quicker players who potentially use the ball well. Yet we are trying to play a game based on wearing the opposition down and controlling the supply of ball, which we don’t have the players to pull off.

                          Do we stick with the antiquated game plan and try and trade in more grunt. Or devise a new one that plays to our strengths? I think Horse is trying a bit of both but it’s not working with the team he’s got available.

                          Changes at Richmond (2017) and Collingwood (2018) both came not from the head coach but from the assistants. I just don’t know if Horse is willing to admit he needs to change.

                          Think the club needs an external REVIEW. One of our problems is that Horse has had tremendous success with what he has done. It may be hard to persuade him things need to change.

                          Would love to be a fly on the wall right now

                          Comment

                          • liz
                            Veteran
                            Site Admin
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 16733

                            #28
                            Originally posted by lwjoyner
                            I think he is, his look in the coaches box is one of not knowing what to do.
                            That's probably because no game plan in the world can work if a team cannot execute basic skills, like winning a centre clearance.

                            When we narrowly beat Essendon just over a year ago, it was a contest between the Swans' contested game and the Bombers' outside speed and dare. At different periods of the game, one prevailed over the other but we were able to win enough contests to (just) win the game.

                            Not only are we lacking two of the midfielders who have been very important contributors to our contested style in recent seasons in Jack and Hannebery (who weren't even able to contribute in those areas before their latest injuries forced them from the team), but Parker and Kennedy are only able to contribute sporadically in this department. The stats say we did win some centre clearances yesterday but I can't say I recall any of them. I attended a few pre-season training sessions in January and February and didn't see either Kennedy or Parker doing anything other than standing on the sideline watching (with Hannebery). Whether they had specific ailments or were just being taken along slowly in response to years of their bodies being battered, I don't know. But I suspect both are feeling the effects of not having a decent pre-season preparation, possibly exacerbated by further niggles or soreness picked up as the season has progressed. (Kennedy certainly had his knee strapped for several games early in the season and we know he had a back injury a couple of weeks ago).


                            Then we have Buddy who looked sore against Gold Coast and even sorer yesterday. He usually plays with a smile on his face but there was a lot of grimacing going on yesterday evening. The commentators kept crapping on about moving him up the ground to escape the blanketing job Hurley was doing. At one point Bruce (I think) quietly commented that he didn't look to be moving well, but no-one else responded and they started going on again about moving him up the ground.

                            We have a couple in the team in Newman and Fox who are probably not quite good enough but are fine to be part of a team if they're the 21st and 22nd players picked. But when they're in a team that also includes three first year players, Dawson (who is for all intents and purposes a first year senior player) plus the still young and inexperienced bodies of Hayward and Florent, it's not surprising that things fell apart. Confidence is a huge thing and the team is bereft of that at the moment.

                            There was a period at the very end of the North game, when we were two goals down with about as many minutes to play, that I told myself we were going to lose but didn't actually mind that much because the team had at least shown it had remembered how to play football. Now I am wondering if that was a group of imposters. Clearly it wasn't, but it shows the narrow gap between a team functioning OK and it becoming a rabble.

                            With hindsight, I think the difference in that game was that the midfield pressure (from either side) wasn't at a high level. But after quarter time against the Suns and for most of yesterday, it was ramped up and we have too many players, especially in the middle of the ground, who aren't able to cope with it at the moment. I thought Florent, for example, tried hard to take the game on at times but he isn't quite yet physically equipped to withstand the physicality of opponents. Similarly with Hayward, who also seems to have lost a bit of confidence in himself. These are good young players and I'm confident they'll develop in the next couple of seasons but they need to be surrounded by fitter, stronger, more experienced bodies at the moment.

                            Comment

                            • liz
                              Veteran
                              Site Admin
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 16733

                              #29
                              Originally posted by Markwebbos

                              Changes at Richmond (2017) and Collingwood (2018) both came not from the head coach but from the assistants. I just don’t know if Horse is willing to admit he needs to change.
                              I think that comment would have merit if we'd had the same coaching panel for several seasons. But we had a big turnover of assistant coaches at the end of last year. It's possible that the new panel hasn't gelled, or that we just don't have good ones. But turning the panel over again just for the sake of change won't guarantee improvement.

                              As I rambled on about above, I think the problem at the moment is playing personnel, not coaches or game styles. It's impossible to make any judgement on the coaching or game style with the team (personnel and fitness of those personnel) the club is currently able to put out on the ground.

                              Comment

                              • chalbilto
                                Senior Player
                                • Oct 2007
                                • 1139

                                #30
                                Originally posted by barry
                                I dont think Longmire is to blame for current state of losing. Sure, questions still remain about turning top 4 finished into flags, but thats another issue.

                                My feeling is that right now, we can barely put a fit 22 on the park. This is based on the evidence:
                                - We are still blooding debutants like Cameron and Dawson at this late stage in the season.
                                - Previous out-of-favour players are getting a game (Allir)
                                - The circus around Reg Grundy's selection. He's obviously not fit, but we discovered that we need him half fit or not.
                                - Playing players who can barely move. Earlier Hannerbury and Jack, now Buddy.

                                Very hard to see us being a contender, with all these injuries. Doesnt matter how good the coach is.

                                Silver lining is we might see AJ back in the team before years end.
                                +2

                                Comment

                                Working...