Liz I agree with most of what you say in your first post and that we have a personnel problem / lack of experienced, hard players.
Personnel wise:
(1) Our backline is in reasonable shape but we have real problems in the midfield. We will (fingers crossed) gets Mills, Hanners (fit), Naismith back next year but I don’t think that will be enough to rediscover our dominance inside.
Do you think we’ll get it from improvement & physical growth in Florent, Hayward, Heeney etc OR do you think we should trade for it OR adapt our gameplan to be more of an outside team?
(2) Similarly our under siege backline is one of the few success stories of 2018, but has enormous problems moving the ball out of D50. We can’t continue to kick it long down the line in 2019, which means we have to change that element of our game.
I understand that the way we move the ball depends on players, when I look at the impact AA is having. Btw he only came in by default due to Melican’s injury.
I guess I’m trying to say to continue to play as we have been next year would be madness. Our gameplan has to change if we are to challenge. We’ve struggled in every game this year except the Saints game.
My note about assistants was more that Richmond and Collingwood changed their gameplan without changing their coach. I guess that Horse is a good with the players, but may not be at the cutting edge tactically. BUT with the right assistance could change significantly as Bucks and Dimma have. I don’t know what the new assistants are like ... it could be them or we may need fresh blood. More about Horses willingness to change.
We do so many things well at the Swans. But I think Horse needs to be prepared to revisit our gameplan in the light of our younger, quicker players if we are to have any hope of success next year.
What do you think should happen next year?
The panel has changed but the default gameplan has not.
Personnel wise:
(1) Our backline is in reasonable shape but we have real problems in the midfield. We will (fingers crossed) gets Mills, Hanners (fit), Naismith back next year but I don’t think that will be enough to rediscover our dominance inside.
Do you think we’ll get it from improvement & physical growth in Florent, Hayward, Heeney etc OR do you think we should trade for it OR adapt our gameplan to be more of an outside team?
(2) Similarly our under siege backline is one of the few success stories of 2018, but has enormous problems moving the ball out of D50. We can’t continue to kick it long down the line in 2019, which means we have to change that element of our game.
I understand that the way we move the ball depends on players, when I look at the impact AA is having. Btw he only came in by default due to Melican’s injury.
I guess I’m trying to say to continue to play as we have been next year would be madness. Our gameplan has to change if we are to challenge. We’ve struggled in every game this year except the Saints game.
My note about assistants was more that Richmond and Collingwood changed their gameplan without changing their coach. I guess that Horse is a good with the players, but may not be at the cutting edge tactically. BUT with the right assistance could change significantly as Bucks and Dimma have. I don’t know what the new assistants are like ... it could be them or we may need fresh blood. More about Horses willingness to change.
We do so many things well at the Swans. But I think Horse needs to be prepared to revisit our gameplan in the light of our younger, quicker players if we are to have any hope of success next year.
What do you think should happen next year?
The panel has changed but the default gameplan has not.
Comment