#AFL Round 21 Weekly Discussion Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dejavoodoo44
    replied
    Originally posted by liz
    I'd be happy about Blakey's decision regardless of which other club or clubs he'd had to chose between. I've only seen him in a couple of U18 games and one NEAFL game but it's enough to tell me he's a deceptively athletic player (albeit physically underdeveloped at the moment) with a very high football IQ.

    But the response from North (and North stooges) to the looming Blakey decision did nothing to convince me my contempt for their club was unwarranted. For example, David King demanding that FS should have priority over academy selections, something that makes no sense when FS is entirely optional for the player.
    Yes, and there seemed to be a certain section of North supporters, who were very keen to boo Buddy, the other week. Not sure why, but my guess is that they're the sort of knuckle dragging morons, who were feeling all nostalgic, about the days when they got to boo Goodesy.
    Though I suspect that if you asked them, they would trot out the old furphy of "He stages for free kicks". Which would be a touch ironic, as they have Ben 'the tumbleweed' Brown in their side.

    Leave a comment:


  • stevoswan
    replied
    Originally posted by liz
    The link is still there. It's the blue text that reads like the score but is a hyperlink to TOR's article.
    All good then......

    Leave a comment:


  • Nico
    replied
    Umpires: my son knows Troy Pannell so I usually take a closer look at umpiring when he is officiating a game. From what I see he is usually rather unassuming and doesn't have as many howlers as others. I would think he is ranked a fair way down the umpiring pecking order. Any thoughts. I note that he doesn't seem to be on the radar/laser beam of RWOers.

    Leave a comment:


  • liz
    replied
    Originally posted by 707
    You'd be very pleased about Blakey's decision then Liz? :-)
    I'd be happy about Blakey's decision regardless of which other club or clubs he'd had to chose between. I've only seen him in a couple of U18 games and one NEAFL game but it's enough to tell me he's a deceptively athletic player (albeit physically underdeveloped at the moment) with a very high football IQ.

    But the response from North (and North stooges) to the looming Blakey decision did nothing to convince me my contempt for their club was unwarranted. For example, David King demanding that FS should have priority over academy selections, something that makes no sense when FS is entirely optional for the player.

    Leave a comment:


  • liz
    replied
    Originally posted by stevoswan
    Rogue Swan.....you cannibalised my post.....can you at least put the link to the article back, which I have been told is necessary when quoting an article? Sheese......moderator? .....try 'terminator!'
    The link is still there. It's the blue text that reads like the score but is a hyperlink to TOR's article.

    Leave a comment:


  • stevoswan
    replied
    Originally posted by stevoswan
    Titus O'Reilly's report on the Swans/Dees match is a classic.....

    Melbourne (78) v Sydney (87)

    "Melbourne kept their ‘missing the finals in the most heartbreaking manner possible’ hopes alive with a stunning display at the MCG on Sunday.

    ...


    Rogue Swan.....you cannibalised my post.....can you at least put the link to the article back, which I have been told is necessary when quoting an article? Sheese......moderator? .....try 'terminator!'

    Leave a comment:


  • KSAS
    replied
    Norf is also one of the many teams I detest. Their supporters seem to have a chip on their shoulder as they get so upset easily when things don't go their way & think the world is against them. Probably due to them being the smallest Vic club. I remember them demanding to get the 4 match points after Jessie White briefly ran on & off the ground (19 secs) as the 19th man. And the ferocious booing of Adam Goodes in his last game

    Leave a comment:


  • 707
    replied
    Originally posted by liz
    Not a Faustian pact for me. North are my most detested team by far, regardless of finals ramifications for us.
    You'd be very pleased about Blakey's decision then Liz? :-)

    Leave a comment:


  • Hotpotato
    replied
    That’s why at at $3.20 head to head (particularly as the Dees had beaten bugger all) the odds seemed way off, so my scrambled eggs, foraged mushrooms and sautéed spinach and skinny cap breakfasts at Bowen Island Cafe this week will taste even better as I watch the highlights of a classic win on my IPad saying grace of course (giving thanks to the Swans guts and ferocity).

    Leave a comment:


  • stevoswan
    replied
    Titus O'Reilly's report on the Swans/Dees match is a classic.....

    Melbourne (78) v Sydney (87)

    "Melbourne kept their ‘missing the finals in the most heartbreaking manner possible’ hopes alive with a stunning display at the MCG on Sunday.

    ...


    Last edited by RogueSwan; 14 August 2018, 08:59 AM. Reason: quoting too much of the article

    Leave a comment:


  • Sandridge
    replied
    I suppose a Bulldog win could be considered to be a very, very, very small repayment on what they owe us after 2016's travesty.

    Leave a comment:


  • liz
    replied
    Originally posted by ugg
    I’d happily enter such a Faustian pact to improve our finals chances.
    Not a Faustian pact for me. North are my most detested team by far, regardless of finals ramifications for us.

    Leave a comment:


  • ugg
    replied
    I’d happily enter such a Faustian pact to improve our finals chances.

    Leave a comment:


  • MattW
    replied
    Originally posted by Sandridge
    Dogs back within 4 pts after being down by 28 at HT. Anyone game enough to say they're barracking for them?

    Now up by 1.
    I'm absolutely barracking for them.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sandridge
    replied
    Dogs back within 4 pts after being down by 28 at HT. Anyone game enough to say they're barracking for them?

    Now up by 1.

    Leave a comment:

Working...