Changes for Round 19 v Freo

[ugg]

McLean is the sub. Inspired by Cox on Friday night no doubt

[AB Swannie]

McLean is the sub. Inspired by Cox on Friday night no doubt

That’s a strange gamble. I guess Reid is most likely to need subbing.

[MattW]

McLean is the sub. Inspired by Cox on Friday night no doubt

Probably inspired by the desire to give the likes of Stephens, Gould and McDonald a game, given they're playing at the same time. Also, the most likely player to break down is Reid!

[stevoswan]

Im less POd about Stephens omission than i am about rowbottom's inclusion . He is seriously average but he gets countless chances that others dont and made worse by the fact he played 2 games last week . Dumb decision. Team is travelling great atm but watch it cost us carrying these liabilities

Oh dear. What was it you said last week in the match thread re: RB. The 'eyebrow raising' statement of "Shame on anyone who bagged Stephens and Rowbottom"......and yet, here you are again, back to bagging RB. After a rare case of positiveness, negative TB has returned. Maybe RB is being rewarded for an excellent second half last week? It's pretty obvious our club rewards commitment to the cause and that includes commitment to what is being asked of you off the field, which is why Stephens can't get a regular gig and RB can. Your constant questioning and criticisms of the MC selections is quite relentless and somewhat tiring.

Of course, everyone has a right to an 'opinion' but in an open forum that means anyone has the right to challenge it....and the way in which it is delivered. Maybe for a little while, try the glass half full approach to our club. That would be a refreshing change of tact.

[longmile]

McLean is the sub. Inspired by Cox on Friday night no doubt

Weird selection continues

[caj23]

McLean is the sub. Inspired by Cox on Friday night no doubt

OMG it’s Mark Seaby all over again

What a moronic call by Longmire

Reid is either fit enough or he’s not. If a small goes down we’re stuffed

This could cost us 4 points

[mcs]

Oh dear. What was it you said last week in the match thread re: RB. The 'eyebrow raising' statement of "Shame on anyone who bagged Stephens and Rowbottom"......and yet, here you are again, back to bagging RB. After a rare case of positiveness, negative TB has returned. Maybe RB is being rewarded for an excellent second half last week? It's pretty obvious our club rewards commitment to the cause and that includes commitment to what is being asked of you off the field, which is why Stephens can't get a regular gig and RB can. Your constant questioning and criticisms of the MC selections is quite relentless and somewhat tiring.

Of course, everyone has a right to an 'opinion' but in an open forum that means anyone has the right to challenge it....and the way in which it is delivered. Maybe for a little while, try the glass half full approach to our club. That would be a refreshing change of tact.

Mamma Mia, here we go again hey Stevo!

Just can't wait to have a crack at every opportunity.....

[mcs]

Weird selection continues

Yeh very strange picking McLean as a sub. Could hurt us should luck conjour against us.

[Bangalore Swans]

Oh dear. What was it you said last week in the match thread re: RB. The 'eyebrow raising' statement of "Shame on anyone who bagged Stephens and Rowbottom"......and yet, here you are again, back to bagging RB. After a rare case of positiveness, negative TB has returned. Maybe RB is being rewarded for an excellent second half last week? It's pretty obvious our club rewards commitment to the cause and that includes commitment to what is being asked of you off the field, which is why Stephens can't get a regular gig and RB can. Your constant questioning and criticisms of the MC selections is quite relentless and somewhat tiring.

Of course, everyone has a right to an 'opinion' but in an open forum that means anyone has the right to challenge it....and the way in which it is delivered. Maybe for a little while, try the glass half full approach to our club. That would be a refreshing change of tact.

Are you suggesting in your above comment that Stephens is not “doing what is asked of him off the field”?

Please clarify your position.

[stevoswan]

Mamma Mia, here we go again hey Stevo!

Just can't wait to have a crack at every opportunity.....

Oi.....pot, kettle, black.

- - - Updated - - -

Are you suggesting in your above comment that Stephens is not “doing what is asked of him off the field”?

Please clarify your position.

YES I AM.....and on the field as well.

[stevoswan]

Nice work RB. One from one!

[stevoswan]

Edit: wrong thread.

[TheBloods]

Oh dear. What was it you said last week in the match thread re: RB. The 'eyebrow raising' statement of "Shame on anyone who bagged Stephens and Rowbottom"......and yet, here you are again, back to bagging RB. After a rare case of positiveness, negative TB has returned. Maybe RB is being rewarded for an excellent second half last week? It's pretty obvious our club rewards commitment to the cause and that includes commitment to what is being asked of you off the field, which is why Stephens can't get a regular gig and RB can. Your constant questioning and criticisms of the MC selections is quite relentless and somewhat tiring.

Of course, everyone has a right to an 'opinion' but in an open forum that means anyone has the right to challenge it....and the way in which it is delivered. Maybe for a little while, try the glass half full approach to our club. That would be a refreshing change of tact.

I Said he shouldnt be bagged for his game last week , he'd played the day before ! Doesnt change the fact i thought he would be a liability today so did not agree with his selection. and he would've been if not for the majority of the rest of the team carrying him today .