Grand Final - Saturday 24 September, 2:30 PM at MCG

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Maltopia
    Senior Player
    • Apr 2016
    • 1556

    Team List Grand Final - Saturday 24 September, 2:30 PM at MCG

    How satisfying to put Grand Final in the post tags field!!!

    Such a great effort across the year despite a couple of bad games (Port, Essendon and GC) and we just got over the line yesterday, but we made it to the GF!

    Hope Reid’s injury is minor and he is fully fit to take the field as he has had a great season.

    Otherwise I think Almartey gets a game as he is better as ruck relief for Hickey.

    No changes elsewhere, everyone gave great effort and there were no passengers.

    So exciting!!!
  • 707
    Veterans List
    • Aug 2009
    • 6204

    #2
    Saturday 24th September?

    Comment

    • liz
      Veteran
      Site Admin
      • Jan 2003
      • 16760

      #3
      Originally posted by 707
      Saturday 24th September?
      I've updated the thread name. Thanks for spotting and pointing out.

      Comment

      • troyjones2525
        Swans Fanatic!
        • Mar 2008
        • 2908

        #4
        Reid almost definitely won't play. We all know his injury history and in the past he's missed several months with injuries similar to this.

        I was leaning towards Amarty myself however I reckon that due to the fact McLean was an emergency I would think he'd have to be ahead in the pecking order at this stage.

        Something to give us a little bit of promise... He kicked 4 last year in our game against the Cats!

        How exciting to be back in the big dance so soon after our minor 'rebuild'. Go Swans!!!

        Sent from my SM-G998B using Tapatalk

        Comment

        • Captain
          Captain of the Side
          • Feb 2004
          • 3602

          #5
          Old Ladhams must be regretting his ill-discipline....

          Comment

          • Markwebbos
            Veterans List
            • Jul 2016
            • 7186

            #6
            I’d this the right thread to ask when the results of the ballot will be revealed? Prices are already ridiculous to fly to Melbourne

            Comment

            • MattW
              Veterans List
              • May 2011
              • 4212

              #7
              Originally posted by Markwebbos
              I’d this the right thread to ask when the results of the ballot will be revealed? Prices are already ridiculous to fly to Melbourne
              No, there's a Finals Planning forum here: RWO - RedAndWhiteOnline.com.

              Ballot occurs today; results published tomorrow: Grand Final Ballot Results

              Comment

              • Auntie.Gerald
                Veterans List
                • Oct 2009
                • 6474

                #8
                If Geelong only put 78 pts on the Pies in the semis a couple weeks ago and we put 95 pts on the Pies yest.......and we beat the Cats this season already.....who should be the fav next wknd?
                "be tough, only when it gets tough"

                Comment

                • i'm-uninformed2
                  Reefer Madness
                  • Oct 2003
                  • 4653

                  #9
                  I’ll be interested in a few match ups.

                  One is Clarke. My instinct is Duncan. He’s a beautiful user and runner who largely plays behind the ball these days. Clarke has the discipline and running power to stick with him. The one curveball would be if Holmes is out they may well switch Duncan back to a wing.

                  Two, is how they use Jack Henry and Blicavs. One of them will play defence as it’s important part of their efforts to keep Stewart a bit free.

                  One option would be to use Henry up forward to occupy Pat McCartin, and push Blicavs back into defence. That means we have Tom Mc on Hawkins, Ramps on Cameron, Fox on Rohan, and they use Henry to keep Pat Mc busy - and Henry can be dangerous up forward so Pat Mc will need to play him close. Meanwhile, Blicavs goes back to fill the role Henry has been playing.

                  The other option is they keep Henry behind the ball given the quality of our forward line. Blicavs may then get used as second ruck, as well as spend some time in the midfield tagging someone. I wouldn’t be surprised if they sent him to Parker or Chad. This seems the more likely of the two given his role as second ruck.

                  Whichever way they go, Henry or Blicavs are the likely candidate for Buddy.
                  'Delicious' is a fun word to say

                  Comment

                  • Ruck'n'Roll
                    Ego alta, ergo ictus
                    • Nov 2003
                    • 3990

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Captain
                    Old Ladhams must be regretting his ill-discipline....
                    Yes it's turning out to be one hell of a price to pay for his stupid act. If we win he misses out on a flag, if we lose - it'd be hard to escape the guilt.
                    It'll either be the making or the ruination of the man.

                    Comment

                    • Ruck'n'Roll
                      Ego alta, ergo ictus
                      • Nov 2003
                      • 3990

                      #11
                      Originally posted by i'm-uninformed2
                      I’ll be interested in a few match ups.

                      One is Clarke. My instinct is Duncan. He’s a beautiful user and runner who largely plays behind the ball these days. Clarke has the discipline and running power to stick with him. The one curveball would be if Holmes is out they may well switch Duncan back to a wing.
                      It's a bit of a worry that 2nd time they were confronted by Clarke, both Sinclair and now Daicos have gotten lose.
                      Did he tag a Cat when we played earlier in the season, and if so, who?

                      Comment

                      • Maltopia
                        Senior Player
                        • Apr 2016
                        • 1556

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Ruck'n'Roll
                        It's a bit of a worry that 2nd time they were confronted by Clarke, both Sinclair and now Daicos have gotten lose.
                        Did he tag a Cat when we played earlier in the season, and if so, who?
                        Our Geelong win was early in the season, before Clarke was recalled as a defensive forward.

                        Comment

                        • liz
                          Veteran
                          Site Admin
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 16760

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Ruck'n'Roll
                          It's a bit of a worry that 2nd time they were confronted by Clarke, both Sinclair and now Daicos have gotten lose.
                          Did he tag a Cat when we played earlier in the season, and if so, who?
                          He wasn't in the team in round 2. Back then a senior spot must have felt like a distant dream, let alone a senior spot in a grand final team.

                          I think Clarke was still quite effective in quelling Daicos in the first half. He didn't really get free until moved further up the ground later in the game.

                          There maybe isn't quite such an obvious match up for Clarke in the Geelong side. It's their spread of mobile aerial marking power in their backline that springboards their rebound. I did wonder whether Longmire might make the cruel choice to change up the side for this reason, but after listening to his comments about Clarke in his post-match press-conference, I doubt that's going to happen. And Clarke did a few nice things with ball in hand yesterday. Maybe with growing confidence of his place in the team he can deliver a bit more offensively.

                          Comment

                          • rb4x
                            Regular in the Side
                            • Dec 2007
                            • 968

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Ruck'n'Roll
                            Yes it's turning out to be one hell of a price to pay for his stupid act. If we win he misses out on a flag, if we lose - it'd be hard to escape the guilt.
                            It'll either be the making or the ruination of the man.
                            I am uncertain as to when Ladhams can return. If next year the VFL starts later than the AFL then does Ladhams need to sit out a further VFL week. If so it will be a harsh penalty stretching into next year depending on when the VFL season starts. I have seen some commentators of the opinion that an AFL match counts as a VFL match if there is no VFL that week. It is a bit of a weird situation. Ladhams thoroughly deserved what he is getting but what he is getting seems a bit open ended.

                            Comment

                            • Captain
                              Captain of the Side
                              • Feb 2004
                              • 3602

                              #15
                              The issue with replacing Reid is that Amartey is the better ruck but big 'buckets' McLean is the better forward. Reid can do both.

                              I would go Amartey.

                              Comment

                              Working...