Roos kicks former Swans Grand Finalists

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sanecow
    Suspended by the MRP
    • Mar 2003
    • 6917

    Roos kicks former Swans Grand Finalists

    Apparently he doesn't rate Nicks or Maxfield!

    "We have only got 25 (players) to pick from but they are the 25 we would most want to play anyway," Roos said.
    Source
  • midaro
    On the Rookie List
    • Jan 2003
    • 1042

    #2
    Nobody rates Nicks or Maxfield.

    Comment

    • timthefish
      Regular in the Side
      • Sep 2003
      • 940

      #3
      Re: Roos kicks former Swans Grand Finalists

      Originally posted by Sanecow
      Apparently he doesn't rate Nicks or Maxfield!



      Source
      yeah, i felt a little uncomfortable for them (and doyle, fixter, vogels etc) but i suppose he's referring to the squad that has essentially been established and winning over the last 15 rounds.
      then again, i think it would be worth trying 15-16 players on field so what would i know

      Comment

      • Mel
        Regular in the Side
        • Jul 2005
        • 883

        #4
        I didn't read it that way. 'the 25 we would most want to play'....I'd want players that have had no injuries and are match fit ahead of those with little match fitness. That's just the way I read it.
        Life's not a spectator sport

        Comment

        • SwallowdaFonz
          Pushing for Selection
          • Sep 2003
          • 79

          #5
          He did mention Maxi as an exception earlier.

          Comment

          • SimonH
            Salt future's rising
            • Aug 2004
            • 1647

            #6
            I read it as selecting 25 out of those who played for the Swans and the Swans reserves last week.

            So it wasn't intended to encompass long-term injured like Maxfield or Doyle. But it does seem to indicate that Saddo, Vogels and McVeigh, even if fit, are well and truly on the outer at the moment.

            Out of our younger players, I know that people that will say (with some justification) that Moore and Malceski are more deserving of a spot, but for some reason I feel sorriest for McVeigh. He's been an automatic selection for a pretty sizeable part of the last 2 years, and in the longer term he's (in my view) an indispensable part of our plans. We need him to be the next Willo, i.e. a fast outside midfielder with good disposal skills. I just hope that missing out isn't too dispiriting for him.

            Comment

            • DST
              The voice of reason!
              • Jan 2003
              • 2705

              #7
              As much as Roos or anyone of us can try, 38 does not fit into 22.

              DST
              "Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"

              Comment

              • dimelb
                pr. dim-melb; m not f
                • Jun 2003
                • 6889

                #8
                Originally posted by SimonH

                Out of our younger players, I know that people that will say (with some justification) that Moore and Malceski are more deserving of a spot, but for some reason I feel sorriest for McVeigh.
                I look forward to the time when we will see all of them performing in the firsts regularly - I think they all have the goods.
                He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                Comment

                Working...