Daniel Chick forward or back

[Reggi]

Anyone think they will play Gasper back on Micky OH! and have Chick up forward?

[timthefish]

Re: Daniel Chick forward or back

Originally posted by Reggi
Anyone think they will play Gasper back on Micky OH! and have Chick up forward?

chick worked well up forward for them last week and they need some aggression and class up there so yes.

[Schneiderman]

Re: Daniel Chick forward or back

Originally posted by Reggi
Anyone think they will play Gasper back on Micky OH! and have Chick up forward?

I seriously believe they have no match-up for him. Gaspar would get torn up, Chick already has numerous times. They have to turn to Hunter or Nicoski, and neither of those are much better.

Micky ... this is your moment. Could well kick 6.

[punter257]

yeah it wouldnt surprise me but i think they'll need him for magic and gaspar may get ROK

[Reggi]

Originally posted by punter257
yeah it wouldnt surprise me but i think they'll need him for magic and gaspar may get ROK

Dream match up ROK would run Gasper of his feet. Does that mean they would have to play Adam Hunter on ROK?

[punter257]

yeah i reckon, other option is nicoski
i'm hoping they put banfield on davis too

[Reggi]

80% of West Coast's Brownlow votes came at Subiaco

[Nico]

Hawks supporters were happy to see the back of Chick. Reckon he is soft.

[Snowy]

ROK thrives at the MCG. Chick is more dangerous up forward. Wirrpunda is a worry. The commentators seem to think he would be a dream match-up for the Eagles if he was on Davis as he would exploit him pace and fitness wise. The advice for the Swans is to get him out of his comfort zone.

[SimonH]

If Chick starts back, or we can force him to go back, that will be a huge win for us, both psychologically and in general play.

He looked dangerous last week, and that's not a word that I'd apply very often to any WCE forward except Sampi (and Matera when on song).

[liz]

Originally posted by Snowy
Wirrpunda is a worry. The commentators seem to think he would be a dream match-up for the Eagles if he was on Davis as he would exploit him pace and fitness wise.

Don't quite see that. I'd have thought that Davis easily matches Wirrpunda for fitness and pace. I'm hoping that Davis manages to work his way upfield for patches of the match. His class in the midfield could be telling.

[Reggi]

Originally posted by liz
Don't quite see that. I'd have thought that Davis easily matches Wirrpunda for fitness and pace. I'm hoping that Davis manages to work his way upfield for patches of the match. His class in the midfield could be telling.

Agree Liz - he may be a bit more explosive.

Chick may need to play back to add some toughness to their backling - BBBBBH may be a little intimidating - based on last week.

You read the key players Judd, Kerr, Cousins, Wirrpunda, Embley, Kerr, Gardiner, Fletcher, Sampi....... How are we going to beat all of that talent?

[Snowy]

Originally posted by Reggi
Agree Liz - he may be a bit more explosive.

Chick may need to play back to add some toughness to their backling - BBBBBH may be a little intimidating - based on last week.

You read the key players Judd, Kerr, Cousins, Wirrpunda, Embley, Kerr, Gardiner, Fletcher, Sampi....... How are we going to beat all of that talent?

And add Stenglein to that, an underrated player, not to mention Cox. Every time I look at those names I just think, Weagles look too hard to beat. Their rucks will have a huge edge with Seaby playing well. Cox loves playing against Sydney.