Chambers or Doyle?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tantrum
    On the Rookie List
    • Apr 2004
    • 397

    #16
    Originally posted by Nico
    Why is it naff to call him Doylee or Doyley. You dont call someone Smitho or Joneso or Browno.
    It's naff, because a Doyley (with alternative spelling) is a lacey little mat that your grandma would put under her tea set.

    It'd be like nicknaming someone "potpourri" or "the lawn bowler".

    So, I accept Official Australian Nicknaming Standards (OANS) demand Doyley, but I think in this case, we should make an exception and go with Doyle-o.

    Comment

    • ScottH
      It's Goodes to cheer!!
      • Sep 2003
      • 23665

      #17
      Originally posted by Nico
      Why is it naff to call him Doylee or Doyley. You dont call someone Smitho or Joneso or Browno.
      It is fine as long as he has a vase of plastic flowers on his head.

      Comment

      • Ruckman
        Ego alta, ergo ictus
        • Nov 2003
        • 3990

        #18
        Originally posted by tantrum
        It's naff, because a Doyley (with alternative spelling) is a lacey little mat that your grandma would put under her tea set.

        It'd be like nicknaming someone "potpourri"
        Quite correct Tantrum,

        Ruckmen can NOT be nicknamed "Doyley" - It's way too close to "Doily"

        And don't try explaining it's a homonym, that's just asking for trouble.

        Ruckmen are path-clearing, pack-smashing, big-scary-beasties!

        They should have nicknames that reflect this . . . such as "Cruiser" or "Boof" or "Lurch" or possibly "The Goodes train"

        Alternately they can have a "big" prefix added to their name, for example "Big Steve" or "Big Jason" ~ the second name is frequently less successfull.

        Comment

        • NMWBloods
          Taking Refuge!!
          • Jan 2003
          • 15819

          #19
          Originally posted by RogueSwan
          and second choice for first ruck?
          He's my third choice for second ruck!
          Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

          "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

          Comment

          • Bleed Red Blood
            Senior Player
            • Sep 2003
            • 2057

            #20
            Originally posted by NMWBloods
            He's my third choice for second ruck!
            Chambers, Doyleeeee and....?

            Comment

            • NMWBloods
              Taking Refuge!!
              • Jan 2003
              • 15819

              #21
              Goodes
              Shaw
              anyone else...
              Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

              "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

              Comment

              • Lucky Knickers
                Fandom of Fabulousness
                • Oct 2003
                • 4220

                #22
                Originally posted by tantrum
                It's naff, because a Doyley (with alternative spelling) is a lacey little mat that your grandma would put under her tea set.

                It'd be like nicknaming someone "potpourri" or "the lawn bowler".

                So, I accept Official Australian Nicknaming Standards (OANS) demand Doyley, but I think in this case, we should make an exception and go with Doyle-o.
                CORRECT!

                Comment

                • Pommie Swannie
                  Waiting for the call!
                  • Sep 2005
                  • 375

                  #23
                  Only one variable - Doyle's fitness.
                  I think Chambers has been bought as a 'back-up back-up ruckman'.

                  If Doyle's not available, Chambers will be there with DJ
                  "You got .. rock 'n roll eyes ..!"

                  Comment

                  • Pommie Swannie
                    Waiting for the call!
                    • Sep 2005
                    • 375

                    #24
                    I don't think Roos wants to use Goodes in the ruck this year if he can avoid it - other than to mix it up during a game.

                    I think Goodes is much better off floating, and able to influence the game - just look at how many people the weagles tried on him during the GF!
                    "You got .. rock 'n roll eyes ..!"

                    Comment

                    • Stevie Wright
                      On the Rookie List
                      • Sep 2005
                      • 150

                      #25
                      Re: Chambers or Doyle?

                      Originally posted by stellation
                      Who will be the regular backup ruckman?

                      not sure if that messes with the muppet's plans, I hope so
                      a fit doyle
                      "We love you Stevie"

                      Lady that sat in the row behind me in 1987

                      Comment

                      • dimelb
                        pr. dim-melb; m not f
                        • Jun 2003
                        • 6889

                        #26
                        Originally posted by Pommie Swannie
                        I don't think Roos wants to use Goodes in the ruck this year if he can avoid it - other than to mix it up during a game.

                        I think Goodes is much better off floating, and able to influence the game - just look at how many people the weagles tried on him during the GF!
                        Agreed.
                        And I think a FIT Doyle might push Jolly for no. 1 ruckman. It's a nice problem to have.
                        He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                        Comment

                        • liz
                          Veteran
                          Site Admin
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 16736

                          #27
                          Hopefully Doyle. Or Shaw. Or even Erikson.

                          Was seriously underwhelmed by the unco'ness of Chambers' performance tonight.

                          Comment

                          • Jeffers1984
                            Veterans List
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 4564

                            #28
                            Donkey and Big Earl are definately in front of Chambers atm.
                            Official Driver Of The "Who Gives A @@@@ As The Player Will Get Delisted Anyway" Bandwagon.

                            Comment

                            • Rob-bloods
                              What a year 2005 SSFC/CFC
                              • Aug 2003
                              • 931

                              #29
                              Originally posted by liz
                              Hopefully Doyle. Or Shaw. Or even Erikson.

                              Was seriously underwhelmed by the unco'ness of Chambers' performance tonight.
                              I asked a 'Geelong identity' about Chambers when we first signed him, thought it might be sour grapes, but I quote " a good kid but clumsy"...
                              Sports do not build character. They reveal it....Heywood Broun

                              I always turn to the sports pages first, which record people's accomplishments. The front page has nothing but man's failures......Earl Warren

                              Comment

                              • Ruckman
                                Ego alta, ergo ictus
                                • Nov 2003
                                • 3990

                                #30
                                Originally posted by liz
                                Was seriously underwhelmed by the unco'ness of Chambers' performance tonight.
                                I also took a look at young Chambers on Friday night. Although not tall for a ruckman (197cm) he has very long arms (which might explain his hit-out rate at Geelong) on the other hand he dropped one absolute sitter on Friday night (I don't think he took a mark despite playing a kick behind for most of the night). The best taps of the best taps of the night were delivered by Big Steve, I hope he will be working in tandem with Jolly this year.

                                In other rucking news, young Sam Rowe also played at North Sydney and looked ok. And I saw young Erickeo at Pennant Hills on Sunday, and he doesn't appear to have put on anywhere near enough meat. So Earl "The Mountain Man" Shaw is probably our next choice in the ruck (good thing he's on the senior list now).

                                Comment

                                Working...