Defensive midfielders

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RogueSwan
    McVeigh for Brownlow
    • Apr 2003
    • 4602

    #16
    defense as a whole

    I see no problem with having these "defensive" midfielders at all. That is the role they are given, they play it well, and we are winning. We do not have a problem with our attack and because our backline is relatively small midfield defense is a significant part of the team set up. I don't believe any of these players will considered expendable in the near future.
    "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

    Comment

    • Dpw
      On the Rookie List
      • Jan 2003
      • 829

      #17
      Originally posted by robbieando
      The following will go

      Warfe (Delisted)
      McPherson (Delisted)
      Seymour (Retired)
      Cresswell (Retired)
      Stevens (Trade)
      Who will take Stevens and for what

      You can rule West Coast out for Staker he is a find and is IMO worth a hell of alot more then Stevens.

      Comment

      • robbieando
        The King
        • Jan 2003
        • 2750

        #18
        Originally posted by Dpw
        Who will take Stevens and for what

        You can rule West Coast out for Staker he is a find and is IMO worth a hell of alot more then Stevens.
        The Bulldogs need talls. But as I said the traded player is anyone from the group of Stevens, Buchanan and Ablett. Plus lets not forget about Nicks he might have some value.
        Once was, now elsewhere

        Comment

        Working...