Tweet
And there's a pleasing additional snippet at the end of this article...
-
-
Would he be so keen if it wasn't a PF ?
I think he's just jumping on the bandwagon....
-
We need MO back to beat Bris - not sure if Saddington actually has any good match-ups against them.
He certainly does against the other potential Grand Finalists.
Tarrant - Cornes - HirdYou don't ban those who supported your opponent, you make them wallow in their loserdom by covering your victory! You sit them in the front row. You give them a hat! Toby ZieglerComment
-
Saddo shouldn't play unless he's 100%, plus who would you drop??
It's a tough call but even if he's 95% it's a risk in such a big game."As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk
Comment
-
IMO he's the player we can most afford to do without ATM.
He's been average to say the least this year."My theory is that the universe is made out of stupidity because it's more plentiful than hydrogen" - Frank ZappaComment
-
Has to be 100%, simply hasn't been good enough this year to justify being ahead of Stevens or Powell unless completely fit."I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005Comment
-
Who would you pick out of those two?Originally posted by sharp9
Has to be 100%, simply hasn't been good enough this year to justify being ahead of Stevens or Powell unless completely fit.
I would like Powell as he goes a bit harder than Scotty IMO."My theory is that the universe is made out of stupidity because it's more plentiful than hydrogen" - Frank ZappaComment
-
Stevens has done nothing wrong and deserves his spot. Powell would be ok, but doesn't have the size to take a KPP - he is way too skinny.Originally posted by Dave
Who would you pick out of those two?
I would like Powell as he goes a bit harder than Scotty IMO.
The fact that Stevens has more experience and is a better mark also make him the man for the job.Comment
-
I'd agree that Saddo's form probably doesn't warrant selectionComment
-
Don't want to sound harsh, but before he went down he was getting spanked by good CHF.
So save it for next years saddo.
Comment
-
Saddo hasnt been a favourite of mine since his return from injury. Before injury, he was playing great, with strong marks and spoils. Roosy selects him because we need his height. But he is too skinny to match up against a normal tall forward (who are usually quite bulky).Using hypothesis testing via confidence intervals:
Nick Davis mark inside 50 = goalComment
-
I will not be happy if Saddo gets a game, he was geting an absolute caining by players, til he got injured.Bloods
"Lockett is the best of all time" - Robert Harvey, Darrel Baldock, Nathan Burke, Kevin Bartlett, Bob SkiltonComment
-
Just watched the Ten news and it was cofirmed by Roosy that Saddo is a big chance (together with MO) to appear in PF.Comment
-
Saddo got though training so its a good sign. To those who dislike him, I think we've been here before. O'Keefe also got though and should playOnce was, now elsewhereComment
-
sorry ?Originally posted by Swansinger
Would he be so keen if it wasn't a PF ?
I think he's just jumping on the bandwagon....
Comment
Comment