Can we improve next year ??

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • footyhead
    Banned indefinitely by Moderators for posting totally inappropriate material
    • May 2003
    • 1367

    #31
    Originally posted by lizz
    Not denied surely - just made more of a challenge. After all, we all know that the likes of Goodes, Schneider, Kennelly (as prime examples) have come via a route other than a top 10 draft pick. I reckon it's a myth that you have to stock up on top draft picks to be in a position to challenge. The two teams currently chock-a-bloc with them haven't given the premiership a whimper yet.
    I think that may have more to do with those teams coaching staff than players,
    At any rate I think we should be trying to win the flag next year, because we obviously are in with a chance, (finishing 3rd this year ),
    If some of our young players don't continue to come on and really come on (we need another Star ) then I think that we are going to have to find the quality from somwhere.
    Hopfully what we require will be found within our already existing ranks !!

    Comment

    • Craig
      On the Rookie List
      • Jan 2003
      • 225

      #32
      Originally posted by Bleed Red Blood
      On injuries did you notice through the year we had barley any injuries though they were all instrumental or KPP that we lost. Glad there were no suspensions to, I hope we can keep that up.
      This injury thing is a bit of a myth. I think that we were pretty lucky with our injuries. Ok we had Mick and Saddo out for a few games, and Ball at the end of the year. Doyal was our only serious long term injured player and he would be third in line for ruck anyway.

      Imagine next year if we lost Hall, Schauble and Goodes for a lot of the year. That would be devistating to the team and would hurt a lot more than Doyal, Fixter and co being injured as per this year.

      Comment

      • pillowtalk
        On the Rookie List
        • May 2003
        • 252

        #33
        That aside, why would the Swans delist Seymour to make way for James? How would we be better off?
        Age perhaps ?
        He who laughs last thinks slowest

        Comment

        • footyhead
          Banned indefinitely by Moderators for posting totally inappropriate material
          • May 2003
          • 1367

          #34
          Originally posted by lizz
          [- it's more a cash situation. Clearly there have been issues in how this was allowed to get to the position it did, but at least now it seems to be being addressed. [/B]
          seems like a worry to me .

          Comment

          • footyhead
            Banned indefinitely by Moderators for posting totally inappropriate material
            • May 2003
            • 1367

            #35
            Originally posted by lizz
            [- it's more a cash situation. Clearly there have been issues in how this was allowed to get to the position it did, but at least now it seems to be being addressed. [/B]
            seems like a worry to me .

            Comment

            • Ruda Wakening
              Survived The Meltdown
              • Aug 2003
              • 1519

              #36
              Originally posted by Craig
              I think that we were pretty lucky with our injuries.
              We're also very lucky to have the best club doctor in the business, in Nathan .
              Sit down or i swear to God i'll have you shot.

              Comment

              Working...