Swans delist Seymour

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BAM_BAM
    Support Staff
    • Jun 2003
    • 1820

    #16
    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

    I was in a good mood until I read this.

    what a very disappointing way to finish with us.
    Here's my heart and you can break it
    I need some release, release, release
    We need
    Love and peace

    Comment

    • Newbie
      On the Rookie List
      • Mar 2003
      • 720

      #17
      We now have five vacant spots, 4 picks before the 50th mark and all teams are required to use the full quota of 38. Given that we had come out and stated that we are not going to draft anyone after 50th pick, this is a very likely indication that Ray Hall is Sydney-bounded.

      While he is (and wont be) a world beater, replacing Seymour with Hall clearly improves our list.

      Comment

      • Ajn
        Draft Scout
        • Jan 2003
        • 711

        #18
        never liked him, glad to see him go.

        Was hard working, but continually gave away stupid free kicks.

        Bring on the draft!
        Staying ahead of the game...

        Comment

        • Ryan Bomford
          On the Rookie List
          • Sep 2003
          • 652

          #19
          With 5 spots w/ or w/o Hall, also leaves the option of redrafting McGlone and/or Buchanan.

          Comment

          • sharpie
            On the Rookie List
            • Jul 2003
            • 1588

            #20
            This really has become an extremely disappointing trading/drafting period for the swans IMO. It seems to have gone from bad to worse, after failing to turn over the list during the trading week. The only way to salvage some consolation would be to nab Ray Hall in the PSD. And that is still no certainty.
            Visit my eBay store -

            10% off for mentioning RWO when you buy. Great Christmas presents!

            Comment

            • Charlie
              On the Rookie List
              • Jan 2003
              • 4101

              #21
              I wonder if there's been a deal set up with Richmond - they can pick Seymour up, they delist Hall so we can pick him up in the national draft (there's a better chance there, I'm certain of it), we both get something out of a situation where we might otherwise get nothing.

              Richmond have 4th selection in the PSD - Bulldogs take Rawlings, Carlton Stevens, Melbourne will take Read if anyone... that would mean that Seymour is Richmond's if they want him.

              Thanks for all your good service Snapper, and good luck.

              Now... who has Warfe got incriminating photos of???
              We hate Anthony Rocca
              We hate Shannon Grant too
              We hate scumbag Gaspar
              But Leo WE LOVE YOU!

              Comment

              • i'm-uninformed2
                Reefer Madness
                • Oct 2003
                • 4653

                #22
                Originally posted by Charlie
                I wonder if there's been a deal set up with Richmond - they can pick Seymour up, they delist Hall so we can pick him up in the national draft (there's a better chance there, I'm certain of it), we both get something out of a situation where we might otherwise get nothing.

                Geez, Charlie, they should have had you on the Chase for Skase. The way you picked that conspiracy theory up when no one else did. We all got confused by other clubs having picks ahead of us to take Hall . . .

                Good work Charlie
                'Delicious' is a fun word to say

                Comment

                • Bleed Red Blood
                  Senior Player
                  • Sep 2003
                  • 2057

                  #23
                  Originally posted by TheMase
                  Departing:

                  Cresswell, MacPherson, Hunt, Seymour, Buchanan.
                  + spare spot on list at start of season = 6 places

                  James and Meiklejohn promoted = 4 places

                  We have 4 draft picks.

                  Or we could use 3 of them and get a player in the pre-season draft.
                  What about McGlone,Crawford all those rokkies didnt we let them go to?

                  Comment

                  • Dave
                    Let those truckers roll
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 1557

                    #24
                    Re: seymour delisted

                    Originally posted by GoBloods
                    i heard on radio , 11am news ,that swans have delisted brad seymour and that he intends to relocate to melbourne to possibly further his career
                    I heard it was actually to further his wife's career (modelling business) and if lucky he felt he could get picked up by another club. How...dedicated. Looks like Snapper might have to do his own washing now!

                    Glad to see him go. He has been playing frustrating footy for a few years now. He actually used to be on of my fave's.

                    Now for Nicks and Warfe...
                    "My theory is that the universe is made out of stupidity because it's more plentiful than hydrogen" - Frank Zappa

                    Comment

                    • Ryan Bomford
                      On the Rookie List
                      • Sep 2003
                      • 652

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Bleed Red Blood
                      What about McGlone,Crawford all those rokkies didnt we let them go to?
                      They were rookies - don't count on the player list of 38.

                      Comment

                      • Dpw
                        On the Rookie List
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 829

                        #26
                        Thanks for a job well done and best of luck.

                        Comment

                        • robbieando
                          The King
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 2750

                          #27
                          I think the new rule is that each club must have at least 37 players on their senior list.
                          Once was, now elsewhere

                          Comment

                          • Bleed Red Blood
                            Senior Player
                            • Sep 2003
                            • 2057

                            #28
                            Originally posted by Ryan Bomford
                            They were rookies - don't count on the player list of 38.
                            so we have 7 places and are most likely to pick 4 in the national draft plus Hall if we can get him in the Pre season that puts our list back up to 36?

                            Are we doing to much cleansing of our list?

                            I didnt think Amon and Hunt were given a good chance before being delisted.

                            Comment

                            • robbieando
                              The King
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 2750

                              #29
                              Originally posted by Bleed Red Blood
                              so we have 7 places and are most likely to pick 4 in the national draft plus Hall if we can get him in the Pre season that puts our list back up to 36?
                              Plus we are brining up MJ and James from the Rookie List so that would make 38. If we don't get Hall in the pre season draft, I think we'll go in with 37 on the senior list and make the decision on the 38th spot during the Wizard Cup (Weather or not we promote a rookie or not)

                              I didnt think Amon and Hunt were given a good chance before being delisted.
                              Sadly thats the why things go and I doubt they were major players in future plans anyway
                              Once was, now elsewhere

                              Comment

                              • Bear
                                Best and Fairest
                                • Feb 2003
                                • 1022

                                #30
                                Originally posted by sharpie
                                This really has become an extremely disappointing trading/drafting period for the swans IMO. It seems to have gone from bad to worse, after failing to turn over the list during the trading week. The only way to salvage some consolation would be to nab Ray Hall in the PSD. And that is still no certainty.

                                IMO the only loss has been Stevens, especially from a short list, and I am disappointed that he didn't get more opportunities in the backline to show his stuff.

                                None of the others have been important players except Cressa who's time was up.
                                "As a player he simply should not have been able to do the things he did. Leo was a 185cm, 88kg full-back and played on some of the biggest, fastest and best full-forwards of all time, and constantly beat them." Roos.
                                Leo Barry? you star! We'll miss ya, ''Leapin''.

                                Comment

                                Working...