Shocking Result on the Trading

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sharpie
    On the Rookie List
    • Jul 2003
    • 1588

    #16
    Originally posted by DST
    Just how were we going to improve our list this year with out giving up something of quality considering where we finished and picks we have on offer?

    Fact is we have a bunch of promising middle ranked players who had fantastic years this year, which because in most cases it is only one year would not have commanded much via trading from other clubs.

    The only way this year we were going to get anyone of quality by trading or bumping up our draft pick was to offload a top three player (ie Goodes, Hall or O'loughlin).

    This year was not the year to do that, Roos knows what the boys are capable of and knows that if he can sustain that and bring on some of the younger talent we have then he can push the heights we did this year without major structural changes.

    I for one would have liked a tall KP backman via trading and a higher draft pick to take a young gun inside midfielder but unfortunately we were not in the game this year.

    The price you pay for sucess I guess!!!!!!!!!!1

    DST
    Fair enough, but I can still be disappointed that we didnt manage to snare anyone, especially after having a number of players indicating they wanted to head to the Swans only to turn around later. And I still havent made any sense of the Scott Stevens trade.
    Visit my eBay store -

    10% off for mentioning RWO when you buy. Great Christmas presents!

    Comment

    • NMWBloods
      Taking Refuge!!
      • Jan 2003
      • 15819

      #17
      Originally posted by sharpie
      You guys can all make a joke of what I'm saying, I really don't care, its not like I'm gonna cry myself to sleep because some internet forum geeks didnt want to be my friends.
      Haha - and you're not a geek while everyone else here is! So, you're different to others on this forum because... LOL

      My comment about bad to worse is that no-one can say that we have improved our playing list during this trading period, hence it is a shocking result IMO.
      I'm curious - what hypothetical trades do you think could have improved our playing list?
      Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

      "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

      Comment

      • sharpie
        On the Rookie List
        • Jul 2003
        • 1588

        #18
        Originally posted by NMWBloods
        Haha - and you're not a geek while everyone else here is! So, you're different to others on this forum because... LOL
        Yeah, thats right! No, I was just venting...

        I'm curious - what hypothetical trades do you think could have improved our playing list?
        Hypothetically, a lot of trades would have improved our playing list. Hypothetically, we could trade for anyone we wanted. Its all hypothetical.
        Visit my eBay store -

        10% off for mentioning RWO when you buy. Great Christmas presents!

        Comment

        • NMWBloods
          Taking Refuge!!
          • Jan 2003
          • 15819

          #19
          Originally posted by sharpie
          Hypothetically, a lot of trades would have improved our playing list. Hypothetically, we could trade for anyone we wanted. Its all hypothetical.
          But if you are going to attack the Swans' trading efforts, perhaps you should provide some ideas of what players, or type of players, we should have tried to snare and what you would be willing to give up for them.
          Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

          "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

          Comment

          Working...