Last season we opened the account in emphatic style against Carlton, the 2002 Wooden Spooners. We then went on to lose 3 in a row.
Talk about extremes, this year we play the premiers of 2003.
I reckon we are better to face the benchmark in Round 1 so we don't lull into any false sense of brilliance like I think we did last season.
If we lose first up, then we know what we have to do to be in a winning position for Round 2.
If we win, then it's a huge "real" confidence boost and not a false one ala the Carlton game.
Is my thinking flawed, what does everyone else think?
Talk about extremes, this year we play the premiers of 2003.
I reckon we are better to face the benchmark in Round 1 so we don't lull into any false sense of brilliance like I think we did last season.
If we lose first up, then we know what we have to do to be in a winning position for Round 2.
If we win, then it's a huge "real" confidence boost and not a false one ala the Carlton game.
Is my thinking flawed, what does everyone else think?

) would tell the club a lot about their game plan against top teams, beating a team to the pulp when it's kind of like expected this year (how can you expect to win games straight away when half of your starting 22 are from other clubs). The satisfaction of being on top of the ladder at the end of the early rounds isn't much of a satisfaction. I remember that in 2002, we were at the top of the ladder in one of the early rounds because we beat poor opposition. We all know how that season went.
Comment