score update for swans v kangas

[NMWBloods]

Originally posted by chammond
That's your best one yet!

Not getting just the teeniest bit obsessive, are we??

Don't be ridiculous. I was simply pointing out an error. If someone said Saddo kicked 50 goals last year and I said he didn't, you'd still say I was Saddo bashing!!

[chammond]

Originally posted by NMWBloods
Don't be ridiculous. I was simply pointing out an error. If someone said Saddo kicked 50 goals last year and I said he didn't, you'd still say I was Saddo bashing!!

An error? You said before that it was true!

A true error?

Saddo bashing? Who said anything about Saddo bashing?

Why don't you just lay down on that couch and tell me all about it . . . . .

[NMWBloods]

No, I didn't say it was true. It was a misleading statement, hence it was an error.

[chammond]

Originally posted by NMWBloods
Also that Neitz didn't kick a goal on Saddington is true

Originally posted by NMWBloods
No, I didn't say it was true.

Now, about my consultation fees . . . .

[NMWBloods]

Yeah, nice selected quoting... try that Neitz didn't kick a goal on Saddington is true yet it is misleading to say "Saddington kept him goalless."

If you can't appreciate the difference, then that would explain some of your other observations...

[dendol]

I will now quote.. myself..

Originally posted by dendol
Thats right. In this particular round 5 game, he (Saddo) didnt have to do too much as the ball was camped in our forward 50, where 10 goals were kicked that last quarter. That is, if your midfield fires, then you can get away with alot more in the backline.

Im not a Saddo basher but in this case, he really didnt have to do too much at all the keep Neitz goalless.