Aker right on taggers: Matthews

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Reggi
    On the Rookie List
    • Jan 2003
    • 2718

    Aker right on taggers: Matthews

    Aker right on taggers: Matthews
    By Peter Blucher
    Brisbane
    March 23, 2004





    Brisbane Lions coach Leigh Matthews yesterday supported midfielder Jason Akermanis's assessment that taggers were being allowed to get away with persistent scragging tactics off the ball.

    Akermanis, set to confront Sydney shutdown specialist Jared Crouch on Saturday night, branded Crouch the AFL's worst tagger and said fans were being cheated out of seeing the best players in action by opponents repeatedly breaking the laws.

    Matthews, often floored by inflammatory Akermanis comments, this time agreed with the outspoken Lions star. "What he says is true. The game has trouble picking up those indiscretions because there is just not enough umpires and too many players," he said.

    "It is an issue. If you had enough umpires to watch every player on the ground, taggers would be being free-kicked all the time. But the fact is you've got umpires with two eyes in the middle of about 15 pairs of players.

    "Because the free kicks close to goal are deemed to be so critical, there's one umpire in the middle virtually umpiring probably 12 pairs of players and one umpire at each end umpiring probably three pairs of players.



    advertisement

    advertisement

    "Those free kicks, those little jumper pulls you see defenders being free-kicked for regularly, are happening around the contest by the tagging-type player all the time. But the umpire can only pay what he sees."

    Asked if he would be speak to Akermanis about his capacity to grab headlines, Matthews replied: "Most weeks probably." But not this week.

    "This is Jason's way of getting on the front foot in what he thinks will be his individual contest. Sometimes I'm unhappy with what Jason says - he knows that, you know that - this isn't one of them. If he wants to do that, it's his entitlement. I don't think it creates any baggage for the rest of us.

    "After the game on Saturday night people will either say 'Jason got on the front foot and played well' or 'Jason gave Jared Crouch ammunition and played badly'. Jason doesn't mind putting himself on the line in that regard. He's got enough courage to say what he thinks."

    Meanwhile, Justin Leppitsch could be pitch-forked into a stunning round-one comeback on Saturday after Matthews confirmed Alastair Lynch had joined the walking wounded in the Lions' big-man department.

    Matthews yesterday revealed that Lynch, who pulled a thigh muscle last Wednesday, was an "unlikely" starter against Sydney unless he recovered rapidly.

    So, with Jonathan Brown suspended, the question for Matthews is whether he can afford to go in without three of his four grand final key-position "talls".

    Leppitsch, who had a shoulder reconstruction in late October, hasn't played for six months but has been doing most training since January. He has been cleared to resume after a mandatory five-month rehabilitation.

    "It's a selection decision," said Matthews. "Does he play in the reserves or the seniors, given that he hasn't been able to play any competitive games to this point? We'll go through it during the week with the medical staff.

    "Is he at more risk playing seniors than reserves? My information at this early stage is no - we reckon he's ready to play. We're putting him in the field. We're putting him out there in combat. Use him as you see fit.

    "But to play round one when you haven't played at all to this point, there's only a handful of players you'd consider that with."

    The option for Leppitsch is an AFLQ practice match for the Lions reserves. More likely, if Lynch is out, he'll find himself at full-forward against the Swans, with Martin Pike filling Brown's spot at centre half-forward and Daniel Bradshaw at centre half-back.

    Also under a cloud this week is four-game premiership team member Richard Hadley, who has missed the past three weeks with a small wrist fracture.

    Second-year defender Anthony Corrie and newcomers Jed Adcock and Matthew Moody are in the mix for a possible debut.
    You don't ban those who supported your opponent, you make them wallow in their loserdom by covering your victory! You sit them in the front row. You give them a hat! Toby Ziegler
  • undy
    Fatal error: Allowed memo
    • Mar 2003
    • 1231

    #2
    I think Aker is doing us a favour - I can imagine that the MO'L Adelaide story would have run for a while longer, but now we've got Aker shooting off his mouth instead. Its a much easier story to handle and possibly something that Roosy can use for motivation (if he needs to).

    Did Crouchy run in the GF sprints this year ?
    Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.

    Comment

    • TheHood
      On the Rookie List
      • Jan 2003
      • 1938

      #3
      Yup, he came in 2nd from memory. Don't ask me who won though because I still had tears in my eyes from not seeing the Swans out there.
      The Pain of Discipline is Nothing Like The Pain of Disappointment

      Comment

      • Sanecow
        Suspended by the MRP
        • Mar 2003
        • 6917

        #4
        A Freo player blitzed the field in the 100m. But I forget his name (not one of their older players).

        Comment

        • BAM_BAM
          Support Staff
          • Jun 2003
          • 1820

          #5
          and no matter how much I yelled at the TV that little Freo fella, wouldn't fall over just as he got to the line.
          Here's my heart and you can break it
          I need some release, release, release
          We need
          Love and peace

          Comment

          • TheHood
            On the Rookie List
            • Jan 2003
            • 1938

            #6
            As for Lethal's quotes, I reckon he has no choice but to say something like that simply because his midfield is so good that the lot of them get tagged and that probably is his biggest enemy from week to week.

            If he had an unheralded midfield and required letting a couple of taggers loose, he might think as we do.

            It is no big deal, just another little story for the media on the eve of Round 1.
            The Pain of Discipline is Nothing Like The Pain of Disappointment

            Comment

            • penga
              Senior Player
              • Jan 2003
              • 2601

              #7
              how does he explain the scotts and hart's tagging?
              C'mon Chels!

              Comment

              • Charlie
                On the Rookie List
                • Jan 2003
                • 4101

                #8
                Disappointing.

                Akermanis we can put down to the moron factor, but Matthews is supposed to know what he's talking about.
                We hate Anthony Rocca
                We hate Shannon Grant too
                We hate scumbag Gaspar
                But Leo WE LOVE YOU!

                Comment

                • NMWBloods
                  Taking Refuge!!
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 15819

                  #9
                  Re: Aker right on taggers: Matthews

                  Originally posted by Reggi
                  Matthews, often floored by inflammatory Akermanis comments, this time agreed with the outspoken Lions star. "What he says is true. The game has trouble picking up those indiscretions because there is just not enough umpires and too many players," he said.

                  "It is an issue. If you had enough umpires to watch every player on the ground, taggers would be being free-kicked all the time. But the fact is you've got umpires with two eyes in the middle of about 15 pairs of players.

                  "Because the free kicks close to goal are deemed to be so critical, there's one umpire in the middle virtually umpiring probably 12 pairs of players and one umpire at each end umpiring probably three pairs of players.

                  "Those free kicks, those little jumper pulls you see defenders being free-kicked for regularly, are happening around the contest by the tagging-type player all the time. But the umpire can only pay what he sees."
                  I don't think there is anything wrong with what he says here.

                  Fact is that most taggers undertake some sort of small jumper holding off the ball, which normally paid in the forward line or a marking contest.

                  He's not silly enough to not do it with his own players if that's what happens.
                  Last edited by NMWBloods; 23 March 2004, 04:28 PM.
                  Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                  "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                  Comment

                  • Steve
                    Regular in the Side
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 676

                    #10
                    What Matthews said is fine but I don't think it specifically responds to or reflects Akermanis' comments.

                    I still haven't bothered to read Aker's comments in any detail, but I had the impression he was having a go at players who 'when they're next to you and the ball is 5m ahead will be looking at you and not trying to just go and win the ball'.

                    Matthews answered a more generic question which is true of midfielders, full-forwards etc (ie. obviously stuff happens unbeknown to the umps and doesn't get pinged).

                    Comment

                    • dimelb
                      pr. dim-melb; m not f
                      • Jun 2003
                      • 6889

                      #11
                      And tonight on Seven's news we had Sheedy joining in to agree with Aker and Matthews. I can't remember the last time Essendon used a tagger...
                      He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                      Comment

                      • lizz
                        Veteran
                        Site Admin
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 16737

                        #12
                        Gee, maybe we should all start watching netball...

                        Steve's observation about the comments possibly being directed at players who make no effort to win possession themselves is reasonable, although that still isn't "cheating". I found that word slightly distasteful.

                        Every player bends the rules and tries to get away with what they can. I've certainly seen Aker deliver some cheap shots when he's known he can get away with it. Does that make him a cheat?

                        Comment

                        • j s
                          Think positive!
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 3303

                          #13
                          Originally posted by lizz
                          Every player bends the rules and tries to get away with what they can. I've certainly seen Aker deliver some cheap shots when he's known he can get away with it. Does that make him a cheat?
                          If by "cheap shots" you mean off the ball or not in the course of play then that's unsportsmanlike and by my definition that's cheating.

                          Comment

                          • Tooth Fairy
                            Regular in the Side
                            • Aug 2003
                            • 724

                            #14
                            b
                            If u don't believe me, I will knock your bloody teeth out and not pay you a cent.

                            Comment

                            Working...