If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Originally posted by midaro Back in 2002, Doyle could have been anything.
He really looked like he could become a dominant ruckman - lots of taps, and a great mark and goal.
He reminded me of a young Paul Salmon - yes, that good. For quite a while I thought he was our great hope.
Now, he looks like he's moving on rails. I hope injuries haven't taken too great a toll on him, but I fear they have.
That being said, he's only 4 games back from injury so he must be given time, (although not necessarily in the seniors).
The salient point is 4 games. Strewth give the bloke a go.
On one hand people on the site rue the fact that blokes like Ablett should get more time to show if they can make it, then when some one like Doyle is selected each week (4) after a shocking run with injuries he gets run down. Stone the bloody crows!!!
The club has a high opinion of him, and contrary to some belief when he was fit he was a dominant centre bounce player with excellent second efforts. You cannot possibly blame the ruckmen for our demise at centre bounces.
oh i want the guy to be good. i'm not trying to bag him even if it sounds that way, bottom line, you can't teach height and he's got that. it's just frustrating when you are losing games, losing in the centre and your best player has to come and ruck, when he should be doing other stuff.
Comment