Stafford out to prove a point to Swans

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bleed Red Blood
    Senior Player
    • Sep 2003
    • 2057

    Stafford out to prove a point to Swans

    Stafford out to prove a point to Swans
    By James MacSmith
    May 9, 2004

    Tigers giant Greg Stafford is still rankled by the treatment dished out to him by Swans officials more than two years ago.

    The 1996 grand final ruckman was traded by Sydney at the end of 2001 in a complex deal that brought Barry Hall to the club. Stafford had a below-par 2001 that Sydney used to justify moving him on, but he has since claimed his poor treatment at the hands of club medical staff contributed to his struggles.

    Stafford returns from a three-week suspension for rough play for today's Tigers-Swans clash and is determined to exploit Sydney's current ruck crisis.

    "When you're moved on and told you're not required, a little bit of that stays with you always," Stafford said.

    "There were days when I first left that I was quite upset about it. But you learn to deal with it. But coming up against your old club is always a chance to prove a few people wrong."

    Stafford was the first Sydney-born player to notch up 100 games for the relocated club, and was paraded for years as a pin-up boy for the AFL's expansion into Sydney, a tag now worn by the likes of Lewis Roberts-Thomson and Paul Bevan.

    "When you're at a footy club, you give yourself to that footy club, and that was the case when I was at the Swans. It was a jumper I was proud to wear because it was my city. But now that I'm with Richmond, I give my all to the Tigers, and now it is all about winning games here," said Stafford who played 130 games for the Swans.

    Stafford will partner former All-Australian Brad Ottens in the ruck today against the Sydney trio of Jason Ball, Adam Goodes and Stephen Doyle. Stafford is confident the Tigers, buoyed by their one-point win over fellow battlers Hawthorn last week, can gain an edge over the home team at the clearances.

    "There's been a spring in everyone's step at training this week. A win gives you that little bit more confidence in your performance. I've had some great matches at the SCG, and I'm looking forward to another one," he said.

    Sydney was badly beaten 50-31 at the clearances in last round's controversial 10-point loss to Essendon. The Swans' promising ruck permutation hasn't worked as well as the coaching staff had hoped. And Sydney ruck coach John Longmire said the club was still working out how to best manage its versatile ruck stocks. But he denied his side had an advantage in that area against Richmond on the small SCG ground.

    "Last week, Essendon got first use of the football all too often, and you can't afford to do that on any ground, whether it is the SCG, the MCG or Subiaco Oval," Longmire said.

    "Their onballers were all over ours, and we can't let that happen again. We were in pretty good form in the ruck coming into last week. But then it all seemed to fall apart last week."

  • TheHood
    On the Rookie List
    • Jan 2003
    • 1938

    #2
    That article was published in Sydney and extended somewhat which included another quote from Horse, something like "Adam Goodes is a great ruckman, but we are still trying to find his best position on the field", or words to that effect.

    It's now more or less a cliche from the Swans coaching staff.

    If I hear this quote one more time about Goodesy, I just might blow a real fuse.

    How many times can they say that with a straight face? I mean is it a ploy to keep the opposition guessing or are they genuinely confused?

    Just state what he does. He job shares the Ruck duties, HF & FF. Put simply, we play him where we want to get best use of him and that is not limited to any position on the field.
    The Pain of Discipline is Nothing Like The Pain of Disappointment

    Comment

    • NMWBloods
      Taking Refuge!!
      • Jan 2003
      • 15819

      #3
      I don't get why they keep making comments like that about Goodes. I think we should simply let him roam free and find the ball.

      So, he should be in the centre for most centre bounces. Against certain ruckmen he should take the tap and against others he should leave it to our larger ruckmen and he should play ruck rover.

      After that he should wander the ground as a midfielder, doing rucking duties and getting the ball.

      When resting, he should play across half back, or occasionally up forward. A few minutes on the bench each quarter for a breather, probably in the middle of the quarter.

      Pretty simple really.
      Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

      "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

      Comment

      • Red
        Foreign Correspondent
        • Jan 2003
        • 651

        #4
        What a big sook!!

        "...poor treatment at the hands of club medical staff"

        What the hell does that mean? Is he trying to blame the medicos for his appalling form during his last few years at the Swans? That's a bit rich of him to say now. IIRC he said in an article that he'd lost interest in footy at the Swans, and that the move to Richmond had re-kindled it (words to that effect).

        So now he's decided to become a good player again, after the Swans <i>officials</i> had persisted with <i>years</i> of crap performances out of him. Well that's ok, good for him. I'm happy for him, and <i>very</i> happy with what we got for him.

        But if he brings his newfound thuggery back to Sydney with him -- like sending his flying elbows or knees into Ball/Doyle/Goodes -- then I hope he gets something more substantial than spittle hurled at him!
        Last edited by Red; 9 May 2004, 11:54 AM.
        To all those people who waited 72 years to see a South Melbourne/Sydney Swans premiership HERE IT IS!!

        Comment

        • Charlie
          On the Rookie List
          • Jan 2003
          • 4101

          #5
          When I think of Staff, I think 'waste'. Partly his fault, partly injuries, perhaps partly poor management. He was certainly unfit in 2001 - not just injured, but slow.

          He really only had a couple of good years. I can't remember him playing well at any time after his injury in '99. Now, regardless of the reasons for that, if he hadn't been performing at the level required for 3 years, what did he expect?

          If it was the medicos - and it may have been a factor, we all bemoan how long relatively simple injuries take for our guys - if I were Staff, I'd be leaning towards simply being thankful for the chance to rejuvenate my career.
          We hate Anthony Rocca
          We hate Shannon Grant too
          We hate scumbag Gaspar
          But Leo WE LOVE YOU!

          Comment

          • Gunn
            On the Rookie List
            • Jan 2003
            • 131

            #6
            I think the major injury he carried over the last couple of seasons with us was misdiagnosed by out medical staff. Hence he was treated for the wrong injury. I recall reading that the Richmond medicos got the diagnosis right almost straight away and he has played well for them after a short period of recovery.

            As far as being a thug is concerned I think Stafford has learned to be proactive in protecting himself. When he played with us he was basically a jump ruckman who was frequently injured when other ruckman (such as Melbourne's White, in particular) just leapt into him with their knees at the centre bounces. I like to see Staff protect himself as he has been Mr nice guy for too long.

            Having said the above I hope he doesn't hurt us on the field today. We got Hall for him but I was sad to see his form deteriorate and sad to see him leave, he being a local boy and a player who loved playing for us.

            Comment

            Working...