kerrs gone

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BAM_BAM
    Support Staff
    • Jun 2003
    • 1820

    #31
    I've got an eagle supporter working out of our office today and his comments on it were about right. He did mention that the elbow came up after the contact, but when I mentioned regardless of where his elbow was he had no intention other than knocking the crap out of Kirky he agreed completely.

    I also loved the way Kirky was indicating as he walked off he was only coming off for 2 minutes.
    Here's my heart and you can break it
    I need some release, release, release
    We need
    Love and peace

    Comment

    • Schneidergirl
      On the Rookie List
      • Aug 2003
      • 468

      #32
      Originally posted by BAM_BAM
      I also loved the way Kirky was indicating as he walked off he was only coming off for 2 minutes.
      Sensational!!!

      Comment

      • monopoly19
        Senior Player
        • Aug 2003
        • 1098

        #33
        Originally posted by BAM_BAM
        I also loved the way Kirky was indicating as he walked off he was only coming off for 2 minutes.
        And the fact that he almost smashed his head into the roof of the interchange bench thingie as he went to sit down - saved only by the quick thinking of the trainers. He had me laughing for a long time...

        Comment

        • sharp9
          Senior Player
          • Jan 2003
          • 2508

          #34
          Originally posted by floppinab
          All I'm saying is that it's a matter of a fraction of a second between a legitimate H&S and what happened to Kirky.
          Kerr stuffed up his timing, now he is going to pay with 2 or 3 weeks.
          And that is absolutely appropriate. Reckless disregard for another player's safety whilst "not playing the ball."

          That's the key, if you're going for the ball then tough luck on the other bloke, if you're not going for the ball then it's your problem Simple really. Also.....what happened later in the match? which previously well held WA captain was able to run riot after his opponent was KO'd and really influence the final outcome of the game?

          I think that Kerr and the club will happily take the 2 weeks he should get because that moment was vital in getting them the 4 points.

          It was absolutely premeditated (not the injury necessarily but the disregard....I'll either lay a great hip and shoulder OR put their most influential player out of the game...either way it's a win for us and worth the price if I stuff it up and miss the next couple....'cos Jako gets his four points)
          "I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005

          Comment

          • dawson
            Senior Player
            • Mar 2003
            • 1007

            #35
            3-4

            Comment

            • Go Swannies
              Veterans List
              • Sep 2003
              • 5697

              #36
              It'll be interesting to see how the Weagles react if/when he's suspended. You have to presume he did it under instructions. But if the tribunal suspect that, too, he may be in for a long suspension.

              Comment

              • Mike_B
                Peyow Peyow
                • Jan 2003
                • 6267

                #37
                And the joke of it all - he gets off because the report was for striking and not charging.

                I'm on the Chandwagon!!!

                If you cannot compete for the premiership, it's better to be young and exciting than middle-aged and dowdy.

                Comment

                • lizz
                  Veteran
                  Site Admin
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 16737

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Mike_B
                  And the joke of it all - he gets off because the report was for striking and not charging.
                  If that is the case, surely the umpire can change the charge, or the video review person can lay the correct charge?

                  I have no problem with H&S in the game but when you are not playing the ball and you make hard, reckless contact with a player's head then surely you have to face the consequences. If that is within the rules then there is something wrong with the rules. Far worse, IMO, than the punch that Holland threw at Willo last year, even though that was off the ball. And remember that Hall got 5 weeks for an incident in 2002 that was ugly to watch and should not be allowed but was far less likely to cause serious injury than hits such as Kerr's.

                  Comment

                  • Nico
                    Veterans List
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 11328

                    #39
                    Robert Walls said In OTC that he should have gone for charging. They how far he ran to make contact, and Walls said it was about the best charge he had seen. Shook his head at the decision to withdraw.

                    Another example of the rabble the AFL admin is becoming.

                    Why didn't the AFL hack, Robinson, report him for a charge? Inept that's why.
                    http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                    Comment

                    • stellation
                      scott names the planets
                      • Sep 2003
                      • 9718

                      #40
                      Originally posted by BAM_BAM
                      I also loved the way Kirky was indicating as he walked off he was only coming off for 2 minutes.
                      That was wonderful. Kirky's career highlights package is going to have him on the receiving end of some real bone rattlers... and then just getting up and wanting to keep going.
                      I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
                      We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

                      Comment

                      • stellation
                        scott names the planets
                        • Sep 2003
                        • 9718

                        #41
                        Originally posted by lizz
                        And remember that Hall got 5 weeks for an incident in 2002 that was ugly to watch and should not be allowed but was far less likely to cause serious injury than hits such as Kerr's.
                        I was actually suprised that Barry didn't get reported after the little wrestle he had during the game. Nothing in it of course and shouldn't have been reported, but he is Barry Hall.
                        I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
                        We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

                        Comment

                        Working...