Tweet
Will Hall be suspended?
nb. this is not "do you think Barry Hall should be suspended?"
nb. this is not "do you think Barry Hall should be suspended?"
-
45Yes0%19No0%26 -
If he does, there is something terribly wrong with our tribunal system.- Impossible is just a big word thrown around by small men who find it easier to live in a world they've been given, than to explore the power they have to change it. Impossible is not a fact, it's an opinion. Impossible is not a declaration, it's a dare. Impossible is potential. Impossible is temporary. Impossible is nothing! -
Logic tells me he won't, because logic tells me he can't.
This is, however, the tribunal, and this is Barry Hall. When Barry Hall is concerned, the tribunal and logic have an inverse relationship.We hate Anthony Rocca
We hate Shannon Grant too
We hate scumbag Gaspar
But Leo WE LOVE YOU!Comment
-
i vote yes... (he shouldnt be) but no doubt the afl will suspend him... part of the conspiracy to keep the swans from winning a flag til its been 100 years since 1933Theres not much left to sayComment
-
After Charmond from Brisbane was suspended, I just don't know if they take logic into account.Originally posted by Charlie
Logic tells me he won't, because logic tells me he can't.
This is, however, the tribunal, and this is Barry Hall. When Barry Hall is concerned, the tribunal and logic have an inverse relationship.Comment
-
The even more bizarre one was when Scarlett king-hit Reiwoldt but it was dismissed because the video footage couldn't quite tell exactly where the punch connected, even though it was pretty obvious is was the mouth as Riewoldt went off with a bloody mouth. If Scarlett gets off for that how on earth good Hall be suspended. Then again, the Charman incident was absurd, and the tribunal are a bunch of idiots, so I voted yes.Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."Comment
-
Voted yes, logic says no, but we all know the AFL tribunal doesn't operate by logic
Edit: point proved belowLast edited by Glenn; 1 June 2004, 07:27 PM.Premiers 09,18,33,05
"You Irish Twit", Quote attributed to a RWO member who shall remain nameless.
Comment
-
What a @@@@*** joke - Licuria was just cleared for tripping!!
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."Comment
-
And there was clear evidence of that, Mr R. Lewis!!!Originally posted by NMWBloods
What a @@@@*** joke - Licuria was just cleared for tripping!!
Comment
-
I am fairly certain he will cop a suspension.
Based on three things.
The consistent inconsistency of the tribunal.
Scarlett off, Charman weeks, Licuria off, Koschitske weeks, ... Where is the rationale behind any of these.
Secondly. Everyone up this week has got off or just been fined
Thirdly. Suspending Barry Hall is big news. The media love it only slightly less than a tribunal hearing involving Plugger.
Voted yes. Not that I think he should but yes cause I think he willComment
-
If there is no vision then they can't. Simple as that. You could take it to court and win easily following the Scarlett one. In that case it WAS on video (but a bit blurry in the background) and it WAS seen by an ump.
The tribunal said that was not enough they NEED clear video.
I think that that decision was absolute nonsense, but that's the way they called it.
How the hell does Kosi get a week and not Licuria? That is madness. Licuria made (light) contact around the knee FFS! How can they say one deserves suspension and not the other??????"I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005Comment
Comment