Barry gets raw deal, says Wallace

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Go Swannies
    Veterans List
    • Sep 2003
    • 5697

    Barry gets raw deal, says Wallace

    Barry gets raw deal, says Wallace
    By Tim Morrissey
    03jun04

    LIKE everyone else Terry Wallace didn't see the Barry Hall-Chris Grant incident last Saturday ... but what he did see left the former Bulldogs coach screaming enough is enough.








    Wallace believes it is time the AFL umpires stop blatantly treating the Swans centre half-forward differently to other players just because Hall is big enough to look after himself on the footy field.

    "I don't know what happened between him and Chris Grant and I don't condone blokes belting each other," Wallace said. "But the way the umpires treat Barry Hall reminds me of the big kid in under-12s or under-14s footy where they never get a call.

    "But anytime they go anywhere near another little kid they get a free kick or a foul called against them basically because they are bigger than the other kids.

    "It seems there's this same attitude among the umpires that Barry is big, strong, ugly and should be able to look after himself. It's not right when it seems that when you go near the James Hirds and Robert Harveys of this world - nothing against them - they get a free kick."

    Former Swans coach Rodney Eade backed up Wallace's claims of umpire bias by saying Tony Lockett used to receive the same treatment as Hall now gets.

    "The umpires don't agree with this, but they are only human," Eade said.

    AFL director of umpires Jeff Gieschen even admitted before the start of the season that Hall was given a raw deal in the free-kick department last season and that several umps were "counselled and coached" for their failures.

    But the message to treat Hall the same as every other player in the league clearly isn't getting through.

    The Swans star was not awarded a single free kick against the Bulldogs, despite deserving several according to Wallace.

    "It's a perception thing. I don't think it's done on purpose or it's anything against Barry Hall personally," Wallace said.

    "It's the nature of the beast but it's wrong, it's rubbish.

    "It's been going on since the year dot. It's not just something which has only recently started happening.

    "I go back to playing with Leigh Matthews at Hawthorn and Leigh was considered strong enough and tough enough to cop whatever the opposition players dished up.

    "Leigh would dish out as much as he would take but because he was the best the umpires would just let him get bashed from pillar to post.

    "In the same side we had Peter Knights who was the pretty boy of the team and was perfect the way he played and the umpires loved him."

    Wallace also supported Collingwood coach Mick Malthouse's claim that the umpires were out of form this season.

    "There's been more games this season where I've walked away from and had to say that that was pretty unacceptable from the umpires than I can ever recall in the past few years," he said.

  • Ryan Bomford
    On the Rookie List
    • Sep 2003
    • 652

    #2
    Thank you, Mr Wallace. Statements like these must have been part of the compensation deal to not coach the Swans.

    The umpies are now obligated to pay Bazza more than his fair share on Sunday.

    Comment

    • Ruckman
      Ego alta, ergo ictus
      • Nov 2003
      • 3990

      #3
      I can't see much point waiting to see if the umpires are going to give Barry a fair go this week (it just won't happen), so I recomend that Swans supporters should start booing as soon as the multicoloured maggots enter the arena!

      Comment

      • RogueSwan
        McVeigh for Brownlow
        • Apr 2003
        • 4602

        #4
        Re: Barry gets raw deal, says Wallace

        Originally posted by Go Swannies
        "It seems there's this same attitude among the umpires that Barry is big, strong, ugly and should be able to look after himself.
        A bit harsh on poor bazza, he ain't no oil painting but ugly?
        "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

        Comment

        • Go Swannies
          Veterans List
          • Sep 2003
          • 5697

          #5
          Re: Re: Barry gets raw deal, says Wallace

          Originally posted by RogueSwan
          A bit harsh on poor bazza, he ain't no oil painting but ugly?
          Do you remember last year when he got punched in the nose and was interviewed straight after the game? The interviewer said "it looks like you copped one there?" and Baz replied "Yeah mate, there goes my modelling career."

          He could always go into acting for soft (hard?) frees and try to win a Grammy. . . (or, better yet an Oscar.)

          Comment

          • sharp9
            Senior Player
            • Jan 2003
            • 2508

            #6
            Interesting that none of the commentators have mentioned that one of the problems is that Barry NEVER stages for a free. when he is infringed upon he does APPEAL for a free...but he never goes to ground. To take the "Ride 'em Cowboy" scenario...he is the ONLY player in the entire league who would have stayed standing under those cirumstances...even though there would 20 or 30 players strong enough to do it.

            LLoyd, Grant, Gehrig, Tredrea, Cornes, Richo, Lynch, Rocca, Tarrant etc. etc. would ALL have been flat on their face when their arms spread wide within a split second.

            Maybe Mal Michael would have taken it, too. He's one I think of as an APPEALER not a SQUEALER.
            "I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005

            Comment

            • Ryan Bomford
              On the Rookie List
              • Sep 2003
              • 652

              #7
              Originally posted by sharp9
              Interesting that none of the commentators have mentioned that one of the problems is that Barry NEVER stages for a free. when he is infringed upon he does APPEAL for a free...but he never goes to ground. To take the "Ride 'em Cowboy" scenario...he is the ONLY player in the entire league who would have stayed standing under those cirumstances...even though there would 20 or 30 players strong enough to do it.

              LLoyd, Grant, Gehrig, Tredrea, Cornes, Richo, Lynch, Rocca, Tarrant etc. etc. would ALL have been flat on their face when their arms spread wide within a split second.

              Maybe Mal Michael would have taken it, too. He's one I think of as an APPEALER not a SQUEALER.
              Right on, sharpie. Bazza needs to spend more time after practice at Fox studios taking acting lessons.

              It's become part of the game these days unfortunately and bazza doing us no favours copping it sweet.

              Comment

              • Snowy
                On the Rookie List
                • Jun 2003
                • 1244

                #8
                Wallace also talked about this on White Line Fever last night. The media in recent days have also covered the issues as to whether or not players perceived to be big and tough get a rawer deal in general from umpires and are more likely to be cited or treated harshly by the tribunal. It is food for thought.
                LIFE GOES ON

                Comment

                Working...