I am worried we are carrying a few too many guys, McVeigh and Schneider in particular. Unfortunately McVeigh just isnt getting sufficient game time each week, I think he needs a run in the 2s. I can understand the argument to keep Schneider in the seniors, knowing that when fit he will be a vital aspect of our finals campaign. Perhaps you need to add to this list Ablett, who after a fine game last week dropped back to his previous level yesterday. But at least he deserves the benefit of the doubt for a bit longer.
At some stage you have to give the other up-and-comers a run to see if they can cut it at senior level, with half an eye on next season and beyond. There are a few guys down there who definitely deserve a run in the seniors, apart from the obvious McGlone. Thewlis got one game, Dempster is the perennial emergency, James is the forgotten man.
And what happens if Fosdike and Davis get back on the paddock. It seems they would come straight back into the seniors without a run in the 2s. Buchanan and possible LRT are both close to coming back as well, but I would think they would come back via the 2s.
Yes, it is a good dilemma to have from a coach's and team perspective, but for the individuals not getting a look in, it must be dispiriting.
At some stage you have to give the other up-and-comers a run to see if they can cut it at senior level, with half an eye on next season and beyond. There are a few guys down there who definitely deserve a run in the seniors, apart from the obvious McGlone. Thewlis got one game, Dempster is the perennial emergency, James is the forgotten man.
And what happens if Fosdike and Davis get back on the paddock. It seems they would come straight back into the seniors without a run in the 2s. Buchanan and possible LRT are both close to coming back as well, but I would think they would come back via the 2s.
Yes, it is a good dilemma to have from a coach's and team perspective, but for the individuals not getting a look in, it must be dispiriting.


Comment