Tweet
If we had a free choice out of the possible trade options. Who would RWO like to see come and play for the mighty Swannies in 2005?
-
53Brad Ottens0%23Cameron Bruce0%12Travis Johnson0%4Troy Simmonds0%3Tim Notting0%11Swannies for life! -
ottens is the pick
can play ruck as well as key position.. poetentially!... the problem is wether he can fulfill it. I feel simmonds would be good but is probably a little less versitile.
We need the tall player.
Only possible problem... we draft ottens and we apparently see him as a ruckman... do him and ball play at the expense of doyle???Theres not much left to say -
Tim Notting.The Destructive Dan Experience - Featuring Teal.
Add me on Facebook - Danny Pinsuti (Except Suzi Olsen and her split personalities.)
238 AFL Games.Comment
-
Only possible problem... we draft ottens and we apparently see him as a ruckman... do him and ball play at the expense of doyle??? [/B][/QUOTE]
You could play Ottens out of the Goal Square, Barry Hall CHF, Magic and O'Keefe the pockets with Davis HF. Ball and Doyle could do most of the ruck work with Ottens relieving. Could be hard I guess having all 3 playing in one side. But it only takes one injury to eith Ball or Doyle to realise just how important it is to have a 3rd ruckman.Swannies for life!Comment
-
Cameron Bruce...please.Comment
-
Brad Ottens and Tim Notting.
Get both of them and we will be laughing. Fill the needs we have and this duo would be easier to trade for than Bruce and Ottens.Once was, now elsewhereComment
-
Brad OttensVicky Pollard: Oh my god I so can't believe you just said that this is like the time I threw Anita's nokia in the canal as a joke and she's like you have well got to buy me another one and I'm like get over it and then Paul came over who's adopted anyway and started saying that I fancy Mark Bennett but oh my god just because I have sex with someone doesn't mean I fancy them.Comment
-
Not a problem. Doyle and Ottens both play well up forward. Our forward line with have so much height and even more potency now. And Ball probably only has a year left, Ottens, hopefully, has many.Originally posted by Matt79
Only possible problem... we draft ottens and we apparently see him as a ruckman... do him and ball play at the expense of doyle???
If Ottens does come to Sydney, our forward line will be a nightmare for oppostition defencces.Occupational hazards:
- animal psychic Amanda de WarrenI don't eat animals since discovering this ability. I used to. But one day the lamb I was eating came through to me and ever since then I haven't been able to eat meat.Comment
-
Brad Ottens and although he is not on the list, I would go after Luke Ball. I believe the Saints have made him a poor offer of around $250000 a year.Comment
-
He will probably only leave St. Kilda for Hawthorn.Originally posted by Syd Swan
Brad Ottens and although he is not on the list, I would go after Luke Ball. I believe the Saints have made him a poor offer of around $250000 a year.
Life long supporter and he is very close with his brother. Think only a ridiculous amount of money would lure him north.Comment
-
Its a good thing we have a ridiculous amount of extra cash.Originally posted by Damien
He will probably only leave St. Kilda for Hawthorn.
Life long supporter and he is very close with his brother. Think only a ridiculous amount of money would lure him north.
Comment
-
Ottens.Comment
-
These are the two I'd like to see!!Originally posted by robbieando
Brad Ottens and Tim Notting.Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."Comment
-
Get Ottens and play Ball or Doyle off the bench as we have been.
Bonus in having one more tall as I have always thought we need in the forward line.Comment
-
what about CHB? does ottens have defensive accountability?I wish my weed was EMO so it would cut itselfComment
Comment