heath james a swan again

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gloveski
    Senior Player
    • Jan 2003
    • 1018

    heath james a swan again

    Heath's a swan again
  • Matt79
    Bring it on!
    • Sep 2004
    • 3143

    #2
    Great to have him back!

    A handy utility player!
    Swannies for life!

    Comment

    • Charlie
      On the Rookie List
      • Jan 2003
      • 4101

      #3
      Amen.

      We hate Anthony Rocca
      We hate Shannon Grant too
      We hate scumbag Gaspar
      But Leo WE LOVE YOU!

      Comment

      • Donners
        On the Rookie List
        • Jan 2003
        • 1061

        #4
        I'm very surprised, but no complaints.

        Comment

        • EMJ
          Go Swans Always
          • Jan 2003
          • 1076

          #5
          I'm happy I think he might just be what we want in the backline
          Love those Swans

          Comment

          • Nico
            Veterans List
            • Jan 2003
            • 11339

            #6
            But he hardly got a game in 2004. Why will it be any different in 2005?

            A utility, where, in Canberra?
            http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

            Comment

            • midaro
              On the Rookie List
              • Jan 2003
              • 1042

              #7
              It's always a worry when emotion displaces logic.

              Comment

              • footyhead
                Banned indefinitely by Moderators for posting totally inappropriate material
                • May 2003
                • 1367

                #8
                The Swans have really @@@@@@ up this draft season.
                Last edited by footyhead; 20 November 2004, 12:07 PM.

                Comment

                • footyhead
                  Banned indefinitely by Moderators for posting totally inappropriate material
                  • May 2003
                  • 1367

                  #9
                  why didn't they steal Mark Mcgough off of the Saints ?

                  Comment

                  • chammond
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 1368

                    #10
                    Originally posted by footyhead
                    The Swans have really @@@@@@ up this draft season.
                    I was a bit concerned at the re-drafting of James, but having read the above statement, I'm now firmly convinced that the Swans have done the right thing.

                    I take it you keep using asterisks in that word because you can't find it in your spell-checker?

                    Comment

                    • Bear
                      Best and Fairest
                      • Feb 2003
                      • 1022

                      #11
                      great news
                      "As a player he simply should not have been able to do the things he did. Leo was a 185cm, 88kg full-back and played on some of the biggest, fastest and best full-forwards of all time, and constantly beat them." Roos.
                      Leo Barry? you star! We'll miss ya, ''Leapin''.

                      Comment

                      • Schneiderman
                        The Fourth Captain
                        • Aug 2004
                        • 1615

                        #12
                        Originally posted by footyhead
                        why didn't they steal Mark Mcgough off of the Saints ?
                        Probably because if even the Colliwobbles dont rate him then he isn't regarded as highly by professional AFL people as you.
                        Our Greatest Moment:

                        Saturday, 24th Sept, 2005 - 5:13pm

                        Comment

                        • Mark
                          Suspended by the MRP
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 578

                          #13
                          Originally posted by footyhead
                          why didn't they steal Mark Mcgough off of the Saints ?
                          Because he is slow, cumbersome and possibly a worse kick than Dunkley (big call i know).

                          his only good games are in the wet where his extreme lack of pace, endurance and skills allow him back to the pack

                          Comment

                          • Rod_
                            Senior Player
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 1179

                            #14
                            Well I'm not upset - hope he can do well

                            Rod_

                            Comment

                            • robbieando
                              The King
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 2750

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Mark
                              Because he is slow, cumbersome and possibly a worse kick than Dunkley (big call i know).

                              his only good games are in the wet where his extreme lack of pace, endurance and skills allow him back to the pack
                              Agreed
                              Once was, now elsewhere

                              Comment

                              Working...