Swans to lose location allowance

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • swansrule100
    The quarterback
    • May 2004
    • 4538

    #16
    the worst part to me is not that its taken away but because it seems others complained and got their way
    Theres not much left to say

    Comment

    • bricon
      On the Rookie List
      • Jan 2003
      • 277

      #17
      Originally posted by peterh_oz
      A fully audited COL allowance is a good thing. The 7% hasn't been set, they will set it each year based on proper COL figures.
      I can guarantee that any COL allowance will in no way be a properly formulated one. The AFL will just dream up a figure that they believe won't upset the other clubs too much; just as they have done with the current COL allowance (7%), which is only about a third of the actual difference between Sydney's COL and the rest of the country.

      Comment

      • NMWBloods
        Taking Refuge!!
        • Jan 2003
        • 15819

        #18
        One of the problems of the CoL is that the Melbourne clubs can justifiably argue that they should have an allowance relative to Adelaide, Perth and Brisbane (the first two mainly). I don't think this will ever happen, hence why the Sydney CoL is always only going to be a 'token amount' <10%.
        Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

        "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

        Comment

        Working...