Eades take on the Swans

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • footyhead
    Banned indefinitely by Moderators for posting totally inappropriate material
    • May 2003
    • 1367
    #1

    Eades take on the Swans

    I think Rodney made some mistakes, but we are very lucky that Roos has done so well.
    I like the comment about Collese protecting his arse. (at least it is insinuated it is Collesse).
    Oh and if anyone is still wondering about Paul Kelly's loyatly's when it comes to the board of the Swans and the up comming elections; have a look at the 4th last paragraph.

    Vengeful? You'd better believe it
    http://www.smh.com.au/news/AFL/Vengeful-Youd-better-believe-it/2005/02/18/1108709435510.html
    Last edited by footyhead; 19 February 2005, 01:35 PM.
    Tags: eades, Swans, sydney
    • Bart
      CHHHOMMMMMPPP!!!!
      • Feb 2003
      • 1360
      #2
      Re: Eades take on the Swans

      FH which candidate are you on the list of nominees ?

        Comment

        • footyhead
          Banned indefinitely by Moderators for posting totally inappropriate material
          • May 2003
          • 1367
          #3
          Re: Re: Eades take on the Swans

          Originally posted by Bart
          FH which candidate are you on the list of nominees ?
          Funny you should ask that cos I have it on good Authority that one candidate feels undermined by Collesses nomination and support of Kelly. Especially the stunt of having him go nominee number 14 on the list.
          That was high jinx on a par with the Roman dictator Nero who believed the machinations of his every action poetic. When in actual fact he was just an average prigg who was handed his luck by the blind providance of luck Not talent.

            Comment

            • liz
              Veteran
              Site Admin
              • Jan 2003
              • 16844
              #4
              Re: Re: Re: Eades take on the Swans

              Originally posted by footyhead
              Funny you should ask that cos I have it on good Authority that one candidate feels undermined by Collesses nomination and support of Kelly. Especially the stunt of having him go nominee number 14 on the list.
              Strange. When I read the blurbs I could swear that it said Kelly was nominated by T Lockett and D Carroll.

              Kelly has as much right to stand as any other member of the club. It's now up to the membership to decide whether they want to elect him.

              And if anyone thinks that Kelly being no 14 on the ballot paper is anything more than a gimmick then they are deluded. It's hardly going to affect Kelly's chances of getting elected.

                Comment

                • footyhead
                  Banned indefinitely by Moderators for posting totally inappropriate material
                  • May 2003
                  • 1367
                  #5
                  Re: Re: Re: Re: Eades take on the Swans

                  Originally posted by liz

                  Kelly has as much right to stand as any other member of the club.
                  Who's saying he doesn't ?
                  But as to your point about his number 14 position being chance, you are wrong.

                    Comment

                    • liz
                      Veteran
                      Site Admin
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 16844
                      #6
                      Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Eades take on the Swans

                      Originally posted by footyhead
                      But as to your point about his number 14 position being chance, you are wrong.
                      I didn't say it was chance. I said it was a gimmick that would have no impact on the outcome.

                        Comment

                        • footyhead
                          Banned indefinitely by Moderators for posting totally inappropriate material
                          • May 2003
                          • 1367
                          #7
                          Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Eades take on the Swans

                          Originally posted by liz
                          I didn't say it was chance. I said it was a gimmick that would have no impact on the outcome.
                          Oh yeah your right, but your wrong as well, cos a lot of people will be more inclined to vote for him just cos it keeps him more in the forfront of their minds. Not to mention the conversation we are having now, cos Liz, you and I both know that the Swans members hang off of every word we say.

                            Comment

                            • Bart
                              CHHHOMMMMMPPP!!!!
                              • Feb 2003
                              • 1360
                              #8
                              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Eades take on the Swans

                              Originally posted by footyhead
                              cos Liz, you and I both know that the Swans members hang off of every word we say.
                              Liz maybe.

                                Comment

                                Previous template Next
                                Working...