Doesn't say much but the following comment is interesting (not just in relation to Hall)
"If someone has infringed high, and there's no noticeable reaction from Barry, we're not sure it was a free kick and so it might not be paid."
This seems to suggest that players acting up after incidental contact can win them unwarranted frees, and that the umpires do "guess" what happened at times, rather than just rely on what they actually saw.
"If someone has infringed high, and there's no noticeable reaction from Barry, we're not sure it was a free kick and so it might not be paid."
This seems to suggest that players acting up after incidental contact can win them unwarranted frees, and that the umpires do "guess" what happened at times, rather than just rely on what they actually saw.

Comment