The Adelaide defence...... + a debutant??

[floppinab]

is to blame it on the Victorians.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/Sport/Demetriou-is-Melbournecentric-Roos/2005/05/02/1114886305855.html

Those pesky Melbournites just don't understand!!!!!

"Ruckman Jason Ball and a first-gamer, whom Roos declined to name, were possible inclusions for Saturday night's game against 13th-placed Essendon at Telstra Stadium."

So who will it be???? I'd love to see Moore get a go.

[Bleed Red Blood]

Why Moore ahead of Malkeski? Obviously I haven't seen any reserves matches, but we can't hold the Kesk back any longer. At 21, without a match to his name we need to see what he is up to before the end of the year.

[ugg]

My money is on Moore, he's been in the reserves best lists for the past few weeks and coming off 31 touches, could add something in midfield.

[liz]

Originally posted by ugg
My money is on Moore, he's been in the reserves best lists for the past few weeks and coming off 31 touches, could add something in midfield.

Or in a forward pocket. He's pretty clever around the goals and we desperately need someone at Hall's feet.

I'd love to see a couple come in this week - Moore would be great and then one of Malceski, Schmidt or even Willoughby.

[ugg]

In one of the 'Ask Roosy' editions, he did mention that like most young midfielders Moore would probably have to start as a small forward. He's also deceptively quick, IIRC he finished top 10 in the 20m sprint in the draft camp.

Also note: Vogels got the 3 votes and Willoughby the 1 vote in the reserves match.

[NMWBloods]

I know he had his knee injury, but are we ever going to try Malceski? If not why not just cut him loose so he can play (and probably star) for another side.

[jenky28]

Re: The Adelaide defence...... + a debutant??

Originally posted by floppinab
is to blame it on the Victorians.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/Sport/Demetriou-is-Melbournecentric-Roos/2005/05/02/1114886305855.html

Those pesky Melbournites just don't understand!!!!!

"Ruckman Jason Ball and a first-gamer, whom Roos declined to name, were possible inclusions for Saturday night's game against 13th-placed Essendon at Telstra Stadium."

So who will it be???? I'd love to see Moore get a go.

If ball and at least one other come in the who are the likely omissions?

I would think McVeigh and some1 else im unsure!!

[hammo]

Re: Re: The Adelaide defence...... + a debutant??

Originally posted by jenky28
If ball and at least one other come in the who are the likely omissions?

I would think McVeigh and some1 else im unsure!!

I would have thought Bevan, Crouch, Nicks, Schneider and Buchanan deserve to face the chop before McVeigh.

[ugg]

I'm not sure if Maxfield is fully fit, he did spend quite a bit of time in the forward pocket.

[swans_premiers]

Moore is the next Paul Kelly

And why is this thread called the adelaide defence??

[floppinab]

Originally posted by swans_premiers

And why is this thread called the adelaide defence??

As a former Adelaidian it is a well known trait to refer to Melbournites as the evil enemy and source of all things bad in the world (as Roos referred to the Melbourne football community in his presser)

I'm over it myself of course

[OldE]

The coach of the AFL's 12th-placed team joked that plenty of people reckon they know what's wrong with the Swans. But no-one seems to be e-mailing him with any possible solutions.

That's because we don't have your email address, Paul. I'm sure a couple of RWOers would be only too happy to give some suggestions.

[ScottH]

[email protected]

Go for it!!!

[adnar]

Originally posted by ScottH
[email protected]

Go for it!!!

Hahaha Yes.

[ROK Lobster]

Originally posted by swans_premiers
Moore is the next Paul Kelly

That needs to stop right now. Just as there was only 1 David Gower, there is only 1 Paul Kelly. Moore is the next Moore, no more, no less. Lets not give him another's boots (or number) to fill.