Eade : We flooded too much

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Schneiderman
    The Fourth Captain
    • Aug 2004
    • 1615

    #31
    Hows this for a stat to date (2005):

    Team Kicks Handballs Disposals
    Sydney 1321 891 2212
    Opponent 1412 730 2142

    Team Marks Tackles HO
    Sydney 551 406 260
    Opponent 609 393 301

    Team Goals Behinds
    Sydney 86 108
    Opponent 98 80
    Our Greatest Moment:

    Saturday, 24th Sept, 2005 - 5:13pm

    Comment

    • liz
      Veteran
      Site Admin
      • Jan 2003
      • 16778

      #32
      Originally posted by Sean

      What I'm trying to work out is the actual cause for the low number of shots. If we are getting the ball inside 50 a lot this season then it's not the game plan's fault - it's either skill errors in terms of delivery or a problem with our forward structure. If we aren't getting the ball inside 50 much then clearly it's not the forward's fault - it's either the game plan or midfielders that are at fault. A bit simplistic I know but I like stats
      We do seem to be bombing the ball into the forward line a lot more this year than the previous couple, where the focus was more on chipping it around until a forward found space and presented himself. Ironically this is what many people on this board were screaming out for.

      While it has some benefits, it also means that more of the forward entries are going aimlessly to space, to congested contests (and we're not a great team for pack marks) or are easily able to be picked off by a spare man in defence.

      I don't think this tactic plays to the forward line's strengths. There are some good one-on-one contested markers there, but we don't have a Jon Brown or Nick Riewoldt and nor do we have any smart crumbers. Whether this is the fault of the forwards or not is debateable. I guess it does indicate that while we think we have a good forward line on paper, it is lacking an element or two.

      Comment

      • ROK Lobster
        RWO Life Member
        • Aug 2004
        • 8658

        #33
        liz Posted: 18th May 2005 03:04 AM

        It seems Liz has been influenced by her AFL heroes and has started popping the no doz.

        Comment

        • NMWBloods
          Taking Refuge!!
          • Jan 2003
          • 15819

          #34
          Originally posted by Schneiderman
          So you see that having shots for goal is not as important as it seems. We did only marginally worse in the 89 to 95 period yet had a horrible run of seasons. We did marginally better from 73 to 79 and on to 85, yet at the end of the season were in much worse shape.

          The simple fact is that we have won more games than we have lost over the last two years, despite our total shots on goal. We have had fewer blowouts either way, and have done well with the team we have. Sure its not exciting, but its not excitingly depressing either.
          Number of shots is important that's why invariably the top teams have a lot as I showed. In our earlier efforts you'll notice that we were typically below 100% - that's below average, which is not good. Then coupled with that we had poor defence, thus making things worse, hence why we finished so low.

          Now we are even worse at getting the ball into our forward line and having a scoring shot. We do better though because we were more accurate than we were in the past plus our defence is better.

          As I also noted, yet you conveniently ignore yet again, it's a very rare occurrence for a team to make the top 4 and not have lot of shots at goal. This makes our task very difficult unless we generate some more scoring attempts.

          However, my original point ("Simply goes back to my old points - we are too defensively minded") was that Roos is playing a defensive style of game. Given our shots at goal are around our lowest ever (plus stoppages are miles higher than for everyone else) the evidence appears to support this contention.
          Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

          "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

          Comment

          • NMWBloods
            Taking Refuge!!
            • Jan 2003
            • 15819

            #35
            Originally posted by Schneiderman
            Hows this for a stat to date (2005):
            Are you going to actually comment on what you think they mean...
            Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

            "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

            Comment

            Working...