Dempster

[Diego]

Why was he dropped? I think he has been one of the positives in the past month.

And yet Bevan and LRT are included into the starting line up. Again we witnessed tonight what they had to offer.

ANd what the hell has happened to Shaubs? There has been nothing on him. He is not even injured. I thought he kept the backline together when he came back.

What is going Paul Roos??????????????????

- pissed and pissed.

[barry]

To be fair, Dempster hadnt done enough in the games he's played. He has looked good when he got it, but wasnt getting it enough. always tough for a young bloke coming into an established side.

Providing he does a bit this week in the 2's, he'll be back. Probably at the expense of Vogels though.

[Mike_B]

Originally posted by barry
Providing he does a bit this week in the 2's, he'll be back. Probably at the expense of Vogels though.

That wouldn't surprise me - bring in a guy who's played down back for a guy who's been playing up forward. Dempster should be back in for Bevan.

[Nico]

Originally posted by barry
To be fair, Dempster hadnt done enough in the games he's played. He has looked good when he got it, but wasnt getting it enough. always tough for a young bloke coming into an established side.

Providing he does a bit this week in the 2's, he'll be back. Probably at the expense of Vogels though.

So Bevan had done enough!!! Oh spare me the drivel about an established side.

[barry]

Originally posted by Nico
So Bevan had done enough!!! Oh spare me the drivel about an established side.

No, I'm all for Bevan getting the arse beleive me. I only mentioned Vogels for tall-for-tall.