The Swans have now played the same 22 players for at least the last three games. Is it possibly time to give one or two other players a shot or should we stick to the same 22? Are there players in the reserves due a game based on their form, or for the requirements of the team?
Same Team?
Collapse
X
-
I am just wondering (without having a personal opinion yet) whether Vogels or Fosdike in particular could be replaced by any other players. In particular how are McVeigh, Malceski, Moore or Schauble going in the reserves?Comment
-
Originally posted by originalswan
I am just wondering (without having a personal opinion yet) whether Vogels or Fosdike in particular could be replaced by any other players. In particular how are McVeigh, Malceski, Moore or Schauble going in the reserves?
As for the reserves read ROK's report;
Comment
-
Originally posted by anniswan
Why would you try to fix something that isn't broken.Vicky Pollard: Oh my god I so can't believe you just said that this is like the time I threw Anita's nokia in the canal as a joke and she's like you have well got to buy me another one and I'm like get over it and then Paul came over who's adopted anyway and started saying that I fancy Mark Bennett but oh my god just because I have sex with someone doesn't mean I fancy them.Comment
-
Originally posted by originalswan
I am just wondering (without having a personal opinion yet) whether Vogels or Fosdike in particular could be replaced by any other players. In particular how are McVeigh, Malceski, Moore or Schauble going in the reserves?Official Driver Of The "Who Gives A @@@@ As The Player Will Get Delisted Anyway" Bandwagon.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Matt79
I suspect we may need some fresh legs in the midfield to curb the Cat's speed and run. How has McVeigh been playing?Bevo bandwagon driverComment
-
I don't see the need for changes. I think our bench is balanced. Vogels gives us another tall option up forward if needed, or he can play down back as well. Fosdike is having good impact coming off the bench. Ball coming on in the latter stages of a quarter to rest Jolly is working well, while the 4th member of the bench seems to be another smaller running player.
I'm on the Chandwagon!!!
If you cannot compete for the premiership, it's better to be young and exciting than middle-aged and dowdy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mike_B
I don't see the need for changes. I think our bench is balanced. Vogels gives us another tall option up forward if needed, or he can play down back as well. Fosdike is having good impact coming off the bench. Ball coming on in the latter stages of a quarter to rest Jolly is working well, while the 4th member of the bench seems to be another smaller running player...And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC
Here it is Again! - Huddo SENComment
-
Originally posted by SXP
Agree, Willo was too slow. We need something faster in the midfield.I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his timeComment
-
"If it aint broke don't fix it" - This comment is definitely not been adhered to by St Kilda who although are winning big games are still looking to bring back 4-5 players. I realise they are their regular players but if the current team has form why are they flirting with it?
Basically a team should be picked in accordance with the opposition you are up against. Just ask Sheedy when he dumped Derek Kickett for the Grand Final.Comment
Comment