Tweet
I see the Hun has already started it's anti-Baz stance. The tribunal could go either way - and I guess that it will be defended and may go to the courts. So either Baz will play next weekend or won't be playing for a few games at the start of 2006 too.
However, back to structure if Baz does go down. In a way, Baz' lack of influence in the past few weeks might be a blessing. I went to sleep late last night (hi everyone coming home from the SCG right now - esp Eirnn and Mel) and woke up thinking that Goodes to move forward may be the solution. He's the only player I can think of that could impose himself on the game up there - and he's more likely to be well treated by the umps. He is fast and can lead. I think that we will see Vogels in for Baz but don't be surprised if Goodes goes further forward I reckon.
It's lateral but could work. Am I about to get flamed?
However, back to structure if Baz does go down. In a way, Baz' lack of influence in the past few weeks might be a blessing. I went to sleep late last night (hi everyone coming home from the SCG right now - esp Eirnn and Mel) and woke up thinking that Goodes to move forward may be the solution. He's the only player I can think of that could impose himself on the game up there - and he's more likely to be well treated by the umps. He is fast and can lead. I think that we will see Vogels in for Baz but don't be surprised if Goodes goes further forward I reckon.
It's lateral but could work. Am I about to get flamed?
Comment