Tipping

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • shearer
    Regular in the Side
    • Jan 2003
    • 673

    Tipping

    As there are no games this week, how about we pick the margin by how much Canberra will beat our blokes by.

    i say 88.
  • Norris Lurker
    Almost Football Legend
    • Jan 2003
    • 2973

    #2
    I'll tip Canberra to win, but I think it will be closer than that. Rain and cold weather is forecast, which could be a leveller.
    Canberra by 21.

    Follow me on Twitter - @tealfooty

    Comment

    • trouble
      On the Rookie List
      • Jun 2005
      • 98

      #3
      act by 42

      Comment

      • Northern_Swan
        Sweet home Novacastria
        • Nov 2004
        • 530

        #4
        wet- 43

        dry- 120+

        Comment

        • BeeEmmAre
          Commentary Team Captain
          • Aug 2005
          • 2509

          #5
          Seeing as it doesn't count to the overall stats, I'll keep the faith.
          Sydney in an upset by 22.
          "It's up to the rest of the players in the room to make a new batch of premiership players next year," Adam Goodes, triple Bob Skilton Medallist, October 7, 2011.

          YOU BETCHA!!!!!!

          Comment

          • BeeEmmAre
            Commentary Team Captain
            • Aug 2005
            • 2509

            #6
            Premier League Top 10

            1. Mark Irving (Campbelltown) 40
            2. Mark Livy (North Shore) 37
            3. Dale Fitzgerald (North Shore) 35
            3. Chris Murphy (North Shore) 35
            5. Gavin Raper (St George) 34
            6. Brett Bedwell (St George) 33
            7. Stephen Hudson (Western Suburbs) 33
            8. Ryan Fitton (East Coast) 30
            10. Aaron Crisfield (Pennant Hills) 29
            10. Alex Goodall (Pennant Hills) 29

            SYDNEY AFL Representative team

            B: 10. Max Collett (32), 19. Ron Wason (160), 25. Lloyd Shepherd (65)
            HB: 23. Mark Livy (2), 20. Troy Luff (39), 12. Declan Donohue (11)
            C: 7. Luke Stanford (0), 15. Alistair Richardson (c) (39), 3. Jason Fleming (37)
            HF: 5. Simon Webb (32), 24. David Coupe (74), 14. Justin Barratt (39)
            F: 1. Ben Rogers (0), 21. Matt Withers (35), 16. Troy Bartlett (16)
            Ruck: 22. Angus Darling (63), 11. Adam Lord (25), 6. Adam McConnochie (65)
            Int: 26. Luke Norton-Smith (16), 8. Mitchell Sykes (110), 13. Chris Lees (35), 4. Mark Egan (11)
            Emergency: 9. Stephen Hudson (6)

            Swans Development match

            Matt Carey (65), Sam Widmer (65), Aaron Crisfield (9), Damian Dell'Aquila (29) - Pennant Hills
            Michael Sawyer (16), Chris Murphy (3), Dale Fitzgerald (3) - North Shore
            Damian Bowles (29), Joel Curzon (179) - Balmain Dockers
            Ben Haberley (74), Joel Robbie (54) - St George
            Jeremy Kiel (136), Ed Kiel (74), Dane Rampe (0) - UNSW/ES
            Tim Kear (0), James Ford (0) - East Coast Eagles
            Sam Dowling (179), Mitch Hogan (83) - Wollongong
            Shanan Kershaw (110), Corey Everson (170), Matt Edwins (83) - Campbelltown
            Joe Cunnington (39), Tim Lambert (100), Ed Carroll (0) - Western Suburbs
            Paul Franchi (0), Will Overs (0) - RAMS

            Only Livy and maybe Hudson in the senior team and Fitzgerald and Murphy in the development team.
            Considering the selectors would have watched a majority of games and players before picking their teams, does this suggest that only Michael Hosking is fair dinkum with his selections of best players?
            Brackets is where I have them ranked.
            "It's up to the rest of the players in the room to make a new batch of premiership players next year," Adam Goodes, triple Bob Skilton Medallist, October 7, 2011.

            YOU BETCHA!!!!!!

            Comment

            • humphrey bear
              Buddy
              • Aug 2005
              • 291

              #7
              No

              It suggests that your system is a waste of time.

              Comment

              • The Ern
                On the Rookie List
                • Feb 2007
                • 54

                #8
                Does anyone know what the Canberra lineup is like?

                Tipping blindly i'll have faith in Sydney and get us home by a couple of goals.

                Comment

                • I_Heart_Kefalas
                  On the Rookie List
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 158

                  #9
                  Originally posted by humphrey bear
                  No

                  It suggests that your system is a waste of time.
                  Agreed. If we went by BMR's system we would have a rep team full of young 20-22 yr olds who all play on a half back flank or wing (high possession getters, likely to not have a tag or direct opponent, who are also likely to receive recognition from the coaching staff as encouragement in the 'bests' each week) with the occasionally senior player like Livy thrown in.

                  Mind you, there is reason to be suspicious that THIS IS how last yrs rep team was picked.

                  BTW I can't for the life of me understand why Dugmore wouldn't be a walk up start at Full Forward for the rep team?
                  Rooboy can you shed any light?

                  Comment

                  • Henry
                    On the Rookie List
                    • Jun 2004
                    • 69

                    #10
                    Originally posted by I_Heart_Kefalas

                    BTW I can't for the life of me understand why Dugmore wouldn't be a walk up start at Full Forward for the rep team?
                    Rooboy can you shed any light?

                    The bloke seems to be unavailable every year for some reason. No doubt some are injured, some have personal reasons and some can't be bothered. I reckon the selectors have genuinely tried to pick the best team from those who've made themself available. I've been impressed with the presence of coach/selectors at club games.

                    Comment

                    • BeeEmmAre
                      Commentary Team Captain
                      • Aug 2005
                      • 2509

                      #11
                      Originally posted by humphrey bear
                      No

                      It suggests that your system is a waste of time.
                      How'd I know that comment would come from one of the anonymous posse that bags everything?

                      I would say it shows that coaches shouldn't be the ones picking the best players. Simple as that.
                      "It's up to the rest of the players in the room to make a new batch of premiership players next year," Adam Goodes, triple Bob Skilton Medallist, October 7, 2011.

                      YOU BETCHA!!!!!!

                      Comment

                      • The Rooster
                        On the Rookie List
                        • Aug 2006
                        • 256

                        #12
                        canberra by 67 points wet or dry..

                        Comment

                        • troy34
                          On the Rookie List
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 129

                          #13
                          Originally posted by BeeEmmAre
                          Premier League Top 10

                          Only Livy and maybe Hudson in the senior team and Fitzgerald and Murphy in the development team.
                          Considering the selectors would have watched a majority of games and players before picking their teams, does this suggest that only Michael Hosking is fair dinkum with his selections of best players?
                          Brackets is where I have them ranked.
                          As a former coach and knowing our current coach the best players in the paper are not generally the best players on the day. The coach or team manager gets asked what he thinks were the best players immediately after the game and has to pick his best 6 on the spot. Sometimes those named could have had a good last quarter and are still fresh in the coaches mind. Sometimes a couple of young guys can be named to give them some encouragement. Other times the coach may not want to name who he thought was best to throw off the coach of the team for the upcoming game. And also they are named without much review of the game or without having time to look at the stats if they are taken. Sometimes a player may be named as best for doing a particular job that day yet in the spectators eyes it may have seemed the player didnt do much at all. All in all the best players named are not always the best players on the day.

                          Comment

                          • BeeEmmAre
                            Commentary Team Captain
                            • Aug 2005
                            • 2509

                            #14
                            This is the only competition I've been involved in that the coaches or footy managers give the best players.
                            It is usually a timekeeper's job as he/she has the best view and has more time to look at that sort of thing.
                            "It's up to the rest of the players in the room to make a new batch of premiership players next year," Adam Goodes, triple Bob Skilton Medallist, October 7, 2011.

                            YOU BETCHA!!!!!!

                            Comment

                            • Joe Dirt
                              On the Rookie List
                              • Nov 2005
                              • 57

                              #15
                              I really think the Sydney Boys will push canberra but just fall short. Canberra by 13 points.

                              Comment

                              Working...