Three only interchange players and 1 substuite player

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGSHOW
    On the Rookie List
    • Nov 2009
    • 139

    Three only interchange players and 1 substuite player

    Can anyone please explain to me the stupid logic of dropping the bench number to three players.And this sub-player rule is just insane this is AFL not soccer or gridion.If anything I believe that the bench should be expanded to five but limit the total interchanges to 20 per quarter any thoughts.This wouldn't be brought into the sydneyAFL I HOPE.cheers bigshow
  • Norris Lurker
    Almost Football Legend
    • Jan 2003
    • 2981

    #2
    Makes no sense to me. I know the AFL's rules committee need to tinker with the rules every year to justify their existence, but I don't like this one. Something smelly's going to hit the fan when a team makes their substitution and then gets 4 injuries and has to keep an injured player on while there's a perfectly fit player on the bench - and it will happen.
    I don't see why open interchange is broke, so why fix it?
    Like BigShow, I don't see the need for it in our league.

    Another factor in our league, which can apply particularly if a club is short of numbers and teams are split at multiple grounds on the same day, is that a team may have less than 22 players available. If a team that was running short had to designate a substitute, it would make it even harder for that team.
    Last edited by Norris Lurker; 25 January 2011, 07:18 PM.

    Follow me on Twitter - @tealfooty

    Comment

    • Cephalik
      On the Rookie List
      • Jan 2011
      • 46

      #3
      In that situation I doubt there will be an uproar, if Coach's use the sub wisely then there won't be a problem, and if they don't.... they brought it upon themselves.

      Comment

      • ShortHalfHead
        Senior Player
        • Dec 2008
        • 1024

        #4
        First I have heard of it. Any link to this rule and does it apply to Sydney AFL?

        Comment

        • Pickup
          On the Rookie List
          • Aug 2009
          • 42

          #5
          AFL should bring it back to 2 subs only no interchange. Make it a game of attrition and an 18 man game instead of a 22 man game.

          Comment

          • Norris Lurker
            Almost Football Legend
            • Jan 2003
            • 2981

            #6
            Can't agree with that. Would inevitably lead to injured players being left on the field. Or farcical scenes like in soccer, where when someone needs a breather and a drink of water they roll around on the ground and hold up play while they're being stretchered off, only to immediately run back on.

            Follow me on Twitter - @tealfooty

            Comment

            Working...