Season preview on AFL site

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • j s
    Think positive!
    • Jan 2003
    • 3303

    #16
    Originally posted by Go Swannies
    All we need is Robert Walls to say that he expects us to miss out on the eight and we can look forward to winning the first 12 games of the season.
    I'm predicting (or at least hoping) that Robert Walls will miss out on a commentary job in 2007!

    Comment

    • Go Swannies
      Veterans List
      • Sep 2003
      • 5697

      #17
      Originally posted by j s
      I'm predicting (or at least hoping) that Robert Walls will miss out on a commentary job in 2007!
      We need him! There's a good case to be made that his "Roos' selfish coaching" comment gave us a flag.

      Comment

      • Missy
        On the Rookie List
        • Mar 2006
        • 445

        #18
        They've got Bevan in the top22, but he hasn't had a run yet. It'll be hard to get back in there. Its a strong team.

        Comment

        • dimelb
          pr. dim-melb; m not f
          • Jun 2003
          • 6889

          #19
          Articles like that I find amusing. As people on the board have said before, we have perhaps the most potent forward line in the comp, a solid midfield and the second stingiest defence. And the best they can allow is 5th? It's not impossible - luck's a fortune - but you'd expect top four at least, and a very good chance at top two. But I quite like being underestimated.
          He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

          Comment

          • NMWBloods
            Taking Refuge!!
            • Jan 2003
            • 15819

            #20
            Originally posted by dimelb
            we have perhaps the most potent forward line in the comp
            This gets raised a lot, and yes we do have one of the best forward lines in the competition on paper. However, we've hardly set the world on fire kicking high scores. So an outsider looking at it is naturally going to discount this aspect, which goes part of the way to explaining the reluctance to put us in the top 4.
            Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

            "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

            Comment

            • anne
              Regular in the Side
              • Sep 2003
              • 719

              #21
              Another article today (I don't know how to post links) will give the Swans even more ammunition or incentive to succeed. It says ST kilda will win and the Swans only beat them last year because of injuries. It is particularly insulting to Sydney. I really hope the Saints fall in a heap.
              ---------||--ANNE--||----------

              Comment

              • NMWBloods
                Taking Refuge!!
                • Jan 2003
                • 15819

                #22
                Another article where?

                To post links the easiest way is to copy the URL from the address bar and paste it into your post.
                Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                Comment

                • liz
                  Veteran
                  Site Admin
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 16818

                  #23
                  Read the back page of the sports section of the Australian while waiting for my coffee today and there was an article suggesting this. So maybe that is the source.

                  Comment

                  • NMWBloods
                    Taking Refuge!!
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 15819

                    #24
                    Yep - I see.



                    First comment - "LAST season St Kilda had the best list in the competition and had they all been fit during the finals, they would have won the premiership. No doubt."

                    What a load of rubbish.

                    Injuries were a major factor for St Kilda (look at who they were missing against us), but to say "no doubt" is just silly. Excusing their poor final quarter solely through injuries is wrong.

                    {note though, with interest I think back to people here who write off the Saints because they fell apart in that last quarter, but is that a disservice to our pressure game?}
                    Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                    "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                    Comment

                    • Sanecow
                      Suspended by the MRP
                      • Mar 2003
                      • 6917

                      #25
                      The Saints did get horribly mangled by Freo late in the season (rd 21?). Bazza could have single-handedly ripped them up in the final though, they were a rabble (moving Gehrig to the backline isn't an "injury", it's @@@@@house coaching). I wasn't the slightest bit concerned about losing that game (compared with Geelong and the Eagles).

                      I will be surprised if Gehrig makes it through the season this year.

                      Comment

                      • NMWBloods
                        Taking Refuge!!
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 15819

                        #26
                        Originally posted by Sanecow
                        The Saints did get horribly mangled by Freo late in the season (rd 21?).
                        As I recall they lost by less than a goal after being shafted by the umpires and 'losing half their side' through injury.

                        Bazza could have single-handedly ripped them up in the final though,
                        He could have, but he didn't.

                        they were a rabble (moving Gehrig to the backline isn't an "injury", it's @@@@@house coaching).
                        Amazingly crap coaching, but that's what we've come to expect.

                        I wasn't the slightest bit concerned about losing that game (compared with Geelong and the Eagles).
                        People thought the same thing about the game against the Saints in 2004 too.

                        I will be surprised if Gehrig makes it through the season this year.
                        Yep, I think he'll struggle.
                        Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

                        "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

                        Comment

                        • goswannie14
                          Leadership Group
                          • Sep 2005
                          • 11166

                          #27
                          Originally posted by NMWBloods
                          Yep - I see.



                          First comment - "LAST season St Kilda had the best list in the competition and had they all been fit during the finals, they would have won the premiership. No doubt."

                          What a load of rubbish.

                          Injuries were a major factor for St Kilda (look at who they were missing against us), but to say "no doubt" is just silly. Excusing their poor final quarter solely through injuries is wrong.

                          {note though, with interest I think back to people here who write off the Saints because they fell apart in that last quarter, but is that a disservice to our pressure game?}
                          Just wondering if Denham is actually a pseudonym for Grant Thomas.

                          It sounds like the sort of tripe that Thomas comes out wih in press conferences.

                          I repeat my prediction...Whilst Grant Thomas is coaching them St Kilda will not win a premiership.
                          Does God believe in Atheists?

                          Comment

                          • giant
                            Veterans List
                            • Mar 2005
                            • 4731

                            #28
                            Originally posted by Sanecow
                            (moving Gehrig to the backline isn't an "injury", it's @@@@@house coaching).

                            I will be surprised if Gehrig makes it through the season this year.
                            I always assumed that it was Gehrig who made that move off his own bat rather than Thomas. Agree tho, a mid-season retirement for the G-Tram is not off the cards. Thomas is no Rocket Eade when it comes to macth-day tactics but he has other strengths that don't get acknowledged on this board (or elsewhere) - Saints performance late last year when most people had written them off was actually pretty good seen in the cold light of day rather than in the unreasonable expectations of your average Saints supporter.

                            As peeving as the AFL review is, at least the writer has managed to express his views w/o maligning Sydney as the "worst premiership team in 15 years".

                            Comment

                            • Sanecow
                              Suspended by the MRP
                              • Mar 2003
                              • 6917

                              #29
                              Originally posted by NMWBloods
                              As I recall they lost by less than a goal after being shafted by the umpires and 'losing half their side' through injury.
                              It was the injuries I was referring to. Classic game and seriously damaged the Saints.

                              Source

                              Comment

                              • Thunder Shaker
                                Aut vincere aut mori
                                • Apr 2004
                                • 4261

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Sanecow
                                moving Gehrig to the backline isn't an "injury", it's @@@@@house coaching
                                Assuming it was a coaching move, I agree 100%. Yes, it was a final, and it was desperation. Nevertheless, the move still had the hallmarks of a monumental brain explosion in the coaches' box. Bazza exposed the stupidity of the move simply by running around and around in the forward line until Gehrig was puffing harder than Puffing Billy. It's easy to run off your opponent when your opponent is unfit.
                                "Unbelievable!" -- Nick Davis leaves his mark on the 2005 semi final

                                Comment

                                Working...