If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
The umpires were shocking last night. Missed some really, obvious important frees, but paid some other tiggy-touchwood in front of the sticks.
Just shocking.
"I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005
Originally posted by sharp9 The umpires were shocking last night. Missed some really, obvious important frees, but paid some other tiggy-touchwood in front of the sticks.
I don't care whether we get Goldspink this year, he's no longer at the top of my most-hated umpires list. That honour, and by a long way, goes to McInerny. Goldspink and McLaren at least partly redeemed themselves with their GF effort last year.
I'm on the Chandwagon!!!
If you cannot compete for the premiership, it's better to be young and exciting than middle-aged and dowdy.
Originally posted by Lucky Knickers Interesting decision when the boundary ump copped the ball to the head. Should it have been a ball-up rather than OOBOTF?
only by technicality. cousin's had belted that on a trajectory out of the stadium.
then again, i think it would be worth trying 15-16 players on field so what would i know
Originally posted by timthefish only by technicality. cousin's had belted that on a trajectory out of the stadium.
I'm pretty sure the right decision was made there. In this instance it's as if the umpire is the "invisible man", the ball might deviate, bounce back into the play, whatever, but a decision should be made as if he wasn't there. In which case the correct decision was made as the ball continued OOBOTF after hitting the umpie on the head.
This rule has lead to the interesting situation which has happened a couple of times in the past few years (one comes to mind in the Syd. Prem League) where if the ball hits the goal umpie, does not completely cross the goal line and rebounds into play, it is play on and no score is recorded.
Originally posted by floppinab This rule has lead to the interesting situation which has happened a couple of times in the past few years (one comes to mind in the Syd. Prem League) where if the ball hits the goal umpie, does not completely cross the goal line and rebounds into play, it is play on and no score is recorded.
Same thing happened in a pre-season match in Canberra v the Tigers a few years back, as I recall. Micky O was robbed of a goal when the goal ump entered the field of play to intercept a grubber kick from an acute angle.
Originally posted by floppinab This rule has lead to the interesting situation which has happened a couple of times in the past few years (one comes to mind in the Syd. Prem League) where if the ball hits the goal umpie, does not completely cross the goal line and rebounds into play, it is play on and no score is recorded.
We should give the goal umpires telescopic necks.
"Unbelievable!" -- Nick Davis leaves his mark on the 2005 semi final
Comment