Umpires

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Legs Akimbo
    Grand Poobah
    • Apr 2005
    • 2809

    #16
    It does appear to me that Leo Barry is seriously being targetted by the maggots. Both this week and last week he has copped some terrible decisions.
    He had observed that people who did lie were, on the whole, more resourceful and ambitious and successful than people who did not lie.

    Comment

    • cruiser
      What the frack!
      • Jul 2004
      • 6114

      #17
      Originally posted by FredFlintstone
      What is with the 50m's penalties given today? Is that a record for one match?
      They're being paid because of that new rule. Sydney players must remember to let go of the marking player as soon as the ump blows his whistle awarding the mark.

      I agree that the umpiring was crap and that the last quarter they really did appear to be trying to even the frees up, but regardless Sydney played utter crap footy for three quarters and were flattered by the final score. WOEFUL!!!
      Occupational hazards:
      I don't eat animals since discovering this ability. I used to. But one day the lamb I was eating came through to me and ever since then I haven't been able to eat meat.
      - animal psychic Amanda de Warren

      Comment

      • robamiee
        Regular in the Side
        • Sep 2005
        • 688

        #18
        I agree we would ahve lost today regardless,
        however in your mind set, when you look at the goals in the first quarter 60% were from frees it can throw you..

        Last week in believe we never in the hunt purely because of the umpiring in the first quarter.
        How many goals from frees last week, it was more than 50% of their goal tally including the 1st quarter.
        Thats what set up the win for the bombers. Hard to chase a team down when the umpires give soft frees in front of goal.

        The rules ahve become so rediculous(bad spelling i know)
        that soon it will nopt be a contact sport. I dont mind if they give them but hell we seem to not get them in our forward line.
        Barry Hall constantly is pretty much mugged at the contest but cant buy a free kick.

        Comment

        • tez
          Warming the Bench
          • Jan 2003
          • 251

          #19
          Today we were lacking in committment and were out everhthinged. We played from behind and spent the
          day chasing. Despite the crappy umpiring we did not
          deserve to win.

          Comment

          • SMFC
            On the Rookie List
            • Apr 2006
            • 104

            #20
            Its happening in the state league in Victoria as well, the VFL.

            The game I saw today was pitiful. Its not so much the umpires I can blame, its the rules and scope they have to apply them...

            Never have I agreed so much with a rival team supporters that our own teams were getting some @@@@eful decisions.

            The AFL is so f'n soccer-paranoid they might as well put nets up behind the goals, get a round ball and some coloured cards for the ump and joined them. Soccer has them completely bluffed.


            Go South!
            Go Bloods!

            Comment

            • Sanecow
              Suspended by the MRP
              • Mar 2003
              • 6917

              #21
              The umpires have been irritating but not nearly as irritating as the lacklustre performances from many of the players. I find that I am less annoyed with the crappy calls in rounds 1 and 2 than I have been in previous years where the players have tried their guts out and been belted by poor decisions.

              Comment

              • giant
                Veterans List
                • Mar 2005
                • 4731

                #22
                There were several decisions from yesterday that I simply didn't understand - I mean I could not have given an explanation to anyone what they may have been for. Which considering I've been playing & watching the game for 30+ years is a tad disconcerting.

                As always, the opposition frees/50m penalties seemed to inevitably result in goals - even then Port missed a few goals from soft frees as well.

                Comment

                • Wardy
                  The old Boiler!
                  • Sep 2003
                  • 6676

                  #23
                  Yes the umpiring was inconsistent - However the Port players were wearing the Swans like a second skin - yet the Swans just couldnt do likewise - They have to Man up, quit with the handball to players who are clearly under pressure & and how about trying to kick long down the corridor - it works for the opposition. And if they kick backwards one more time - UGGGHHHHHHH!
                  I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure..................
                  Chickens drink - but they don't pee!
                  AGE IS ONLY IMPORTANT FOR TWO THINGS - WINE & CHEESE!

                  Comment

                  • wyatt
                    Sitting in the red vest
                    • Jul 2004
                    • 124

                    #24
                    Originally posted by Legs Akimbo
                    It does appear to me that Leo Barry is seriously being targetted by the maggots. Both this week and last week he has copped some terrible decisions.
                    I think Leo is now being exposed for what he truly is - a great half-back who admirably held down the full-back position primarily by using great body work and speed against much taller and heavier opponents. But let's face it, the techniques he used weren't always strictly legal. Now that the umps are cracking down on minor infringements against the backs (jumper grabbing & arm chopping), it's time to give up the experiment, send Leo back to HBF, and blood a new boy with a view to the future at full back (Vogels, Grundy).
                    Last edited by wyatt; 10 April 2006, 01:06 PM.

                    Comment

                    Working...