If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
can't believe i am actually nervous about this game. If Fatnall and Crapola play well we may get done. Baz does tend to like to kick 7 goals at the dome though.
Originally posted by dread and might can't believe i am actually nervous about this game. If Fatnall and Crapola play well we may get done. Baz does tend to like to kick 7 goals at the dome though.
He tends to always kick a bag against them. Don't worry mate, you're not the only one that is nervous about this one.
Official Driver Of The "Who Gives A @@@@ As The Player Will Get Delisted Anyway" Bandwagon.
Originally posted by Deano Supremo You play it pretty ugly, but if it gets the job done then that's all that matters.
Ummm... did you notice you had your whole team in the defensive half for a lot of the game?
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."
Originally posted by Deano Supremo You play it pretty ugly, but if it gets the job done then that's all that matters.
It was interesting to see the 18 man defence of Carlton. As ther 3aw commentators finally admitted at about 10.56 pm after the game, Carlton were the main culprits in playing the flood, or ultra flood. You can't kick a winning score when all of your men are in defence and even then not manning up. That's why the Swans just kept chipping it aroiund. There was no manning up by Carlton, because 16 out of the 18 were in the D50 arc, the other 2 were on the defensive side of the centre square.
Look up "ugly football" in the dictionary and you will see Carlton's defensive 18 on Saturday night.
Comment