Do players deserve a significant pay rise?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • goswannie14
    Leadership Group
    • Sep 2005
    • 11166

    Do players deserve a significant pay rise?

    Was just looking at this debate on the AFL website.

    Do players deserve a significant pay rise?

    What do you think? Do they deserve a significant pay rise?


    According to Mike Sheahans figures they are paid pretty well. Interesting to note that Brendon Gale doesn't quote any figures, I guess the facts don't help his argument.
    14
    Yes, they deserve a significant pay rise.
    0%
    2
    Yes, they deserve a pay rise but not a significant one.
    0%
    5
    No, they are paid enough already.
    0%
    7
    I think ROK is being over paid.
    0%
    0
    Does God believe in Atheists?
  • Mike_B
    Peyow Peyow
    • Jan 2003
    • 6267

    #2
    From what I understand of it...the need for pay rises is at the rookie listed and newly drafted levels, not at the established senior player levels. The rookies have to devote their time to trying to make a career out of football, often as a trade-off against developing other potential skills, with no guarantees of actually making it, and their monetary rewards are pretty poor for all of that.

    I'm on the Chandwagon!!!

    If you cannot compete for the premiership, it's better to be young and exciting than middle-aged and dowdy.

    Comment

    • NMWBloods
      Taking Refuge!!
      • Jan 2003
      • 15819

      #3
      No. The clubs cannot afford to pay the players any more. Gale's arguments about popularity are meaningless if the clubs aren't profitable and most of them are only just (part of which is poor management though).

      As for the younger players, isn't the minimum salary about $50K? Not bad from someone in late teens, early 20s.
      Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

      "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

      Comment

      • j s
        Think positive!
        • Jan 2003
        • 3303

        #4
        Nah!! The extra money should be used to reduce the cost of memberships.

        Damn, I wish those pigs would stop flying over my house!

        Comment

        • ScottH
          It's Goodes to cheer!!
          • Sep 2003
          • 23665

          #5
          I think we need one for the pain and suffering we are caused each week.

          Comment

          • JF_Bay22_SCG
            expat Sydneysider
            • Jan 2003
            • 3978

            #6
            I work up to 45 hours a week. I get paid a a measly $33000 a year. In Sydney I find that genuinely struggle to make ends meet, especially given my rather 'extensive' travel schedule.

            Why should a person who works for not even a quarter of that time get paid 10-20 times as much as me? I reckon that sucks.

            AFL players are paid too much as it is I reckon.

            JF
            "Never ever ever state that Sydney is gone.They are like cockroaches in the aftermath of a nuclear war"
            (Forum poster 'Change', Big Footy 04Apr09)

            Comment

            • NMWBloods
              Taking Refuge!!
              • Jan 2003
              • 15819

              #7
              Originally posted by JF_Bay22_SCG
              I work up to 45 hours a week. I get paid a a measly $33000 a year. In Sydney I find that genuinely struggle to make ends meet, especially given my rather 'extensive' travel schedule.
              @@@@ - I can imagine you would that even without the travel!!

              Why should a person who works for not even a quarter of that time get paid 10-20 times as much as me? I reckon that sucks.

              AFL players are paid too much as it is I reckon.
              I agree, although they do work more than ten hours per week.
              Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.

              "[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."

              Comment

              • Destructive
                Football Terrorist
                • Jan 2003
                • 976

                #8
                I think they're paid enough already.
                The Destructive Dan Experience - Featuring Teal.
                Add me on Facebook - Danny Pinsuti (Except Suzi Olsen and her split personalities.)
                238 AFL Games.

                Comment

                • Big Al
                  Veterans List
                  • Feb 2005
                  • 7007

                  #9
                  They should be paid exactly what the game can afford. At the moment with a lot of clubs struggling a pay rise doesn't seem justified.
                  ..And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC

                  Here it is Again! - Huddo SEN

                  Comment

                  • Thunder Shaker
                    Aut vincere aut mori
                    • Apr 2004
                    • 4226

                    #10
                    A pay rise is warranted, but not necessarily for the players. Where I think the pay rise should be paid is the annual dividends to the clubs. The new television rights deal gives the AFL an additional $40 million a year. If half of that was distributed to the 16 clubs, each club would get an additional $1.25 million a year. With that sort of money, clubs like the Dogs, Demons and Roos would be much less likely to require financial assistance.
                    "Unbelievable!" -- Nick Davis leaves his mark on the 2005 semi final

                    Comment

                    Working...