Goodes

[SimonH]

Look, this is getting a little embarrassing. You've said you're wrong and you're very sorry, I've accepted it, and we can both just move on. There's no need to keep boot-licking; it's unedifying.

(I'm sorry, I refuse to use smilies. How much would Swift's A Modest Proposal have been improved if it was liberally littered with smilies and roll-eyes?)

[NMWBloods]

Witty and clever writing doesn't require smilies...

[SimonH]

Originally posted by NMWBloods
Witty and clever writing doesn't require smilies...

And sometimes hooks don't even need bait...

[NMWBloods]

Originally posted by SimonH
And sometimes hooks don't even need bait...

And sometimes trolls don't need bridges...

[Schneiderman]

Originally posted by NMWBloods
And at his worst he is a liability.

Harsh.

[satchmopugdog]

Great to catch up that Goodes is playing well at the moment. He has become my favourite player and I have taken note to watch the replay of the Lions game when I get back.

[graystar]

I have always been a fan of goodes ever since he played as a ruck with a injured wrist for the rest of a game. That was ages ago, but I thought now there is someone you want in your team.

[goswannie14]

Originally posted by NMWBloods
And at his worst he is a liability.

Which could also be said of nearly every other footballer in the league.

[Captain]

Originally posted by Schneiderman
Harsh.

Agree.

He can still be very damaging when his form is down so unfair to say he is a liability. Add that he takes one of the oppositions best players week in week out, surely when his form is down he will free up someone else.

[NMWBloods]

I thought that against Port he was a liability. Was meant to be on Cornes, let him run around, and gave us virtually nothing in offence in return.

[jude_boltons_babe]

well done adam great game